跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03703297
NCT03703297进行中(未招募)3 期

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center, International Study of Durvalumab or Durvalumab and Tremelimumab as Consolidation Treatment for Patients With Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Not Progressed Following Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy (ADRIATIC)

AstraZeneca1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 730 人开始时间: 2018年9月27日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
进行中(未招募)
发起方
AstraZeneca
入组人数
730
试验地点
1
主要终点
Durvalumab Versus Placebo: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1

研究概览

简要总结

This is a Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center, International Study of Durvalumab or Durvalumab and Tremelimumab as Consolidation Treatment for Patients with LS-SCLC Who Have Not Progressed Following Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 130 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Durvalumab + Placebo

Experimental

Durvalumab monotherapy: Durvalumab (1500 mg intravenous [IV]) q4w in combination with placebo saline solution (IV) q4w for up to 4 doses/cycles each, followed by durvalumab 1500 mg q4w. The first durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg dose q4w will be 4 weeks after the final dose of durvalumab in combination with placebo saline solution.

干预措施: Durvalumab (Drug)

Durvalumab + Placebo

Experimental

Durvalumab monotherapy: Durvalumab (1500 mg intravenous [IV]) q4w in combination with placebo saline solution (IV) q4w for up to 4 doses/cycles each, followed by durvalumab 1500 mg q4w. The first durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg dose q4w will be 4 weeks after the final dose of durvalumab in combination with placebo saline solution.

干预措施: Placebo (Other)

Durvalumab + Tremelimumab

Experimental

Durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab: Durvalumab (1500 mg IV) q4w in combination with tremelimumab (75 mg IV) q4w for up to 4 doses/cycles each, followed by durvalumab 1500 mg q4w. The first durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg dose q4w will be 4 weeks after the final dose of durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab.

干预措施: Durvalumab (Drug)

Durvalumab + Tremelimumab

Experimental

Durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab: Durvalumab (1500 mg IV) q4w in combination with tremelimumab (75 mg IV) q4w for up to 4 doses/cycles each, followed by durvalumab 1500 mg q4w. The first durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg dose q4w will be 4 weeks after the final dose of durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab.

干预措施: Tremelimumab (Drug)

Placebo + Placebo

Placebo Comparator

Placebo: Placebo saline solution (IV) q4w in combination with a second placebo saline solution (IV) q4w for up to 4 doses/cycles each, followed by a single placebo saline solution q4w. The first placebo saline solution monotherapy dose q4w will be 4 weeks after the final dose of the 2 placebo saline solutions in combination.

干预措施: Placebo (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Durvalumab Versus Placebo: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1

时间窗: Response evaluations performed every 8 weeks (q8w) ± 1 week up to 72 weeks, then every 12 weeks (q12w) ± 1 week up to 96 weeks, and then every 24 weeks (q24w) thereafter until PD, up to DCO date 15 January 2024 (a maximum of approximately 1936 days)

PFS per RECIST 1.1 assessed by BICR was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression (PD) or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs), taking as reference the smallest previous sum of diameters (nadir) - this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm) from nadir. Median PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its confidence interval (CI) using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Durvalumab Versus Placebo: Overall Survival (OS)

时间窗: From date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to DCO date 15 January 2024 (a maximum of approximately 1936 days)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Median OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

次要结局

  • Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab Combination Versus Placebo: Progression-Free Survival Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1(Response evaluations performed q8w ± 1 week up to 72 weeks, then q12w ± 1 week up to 96 weeks, and then q24w thereafter until PD, up to approximately 89 months)
  • Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab Combination Versus Placebo: Overall Survival(From date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to approximately 89 months)
  • Durvalumab Versus Placebo: Objective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1(Response evaluations performed q8w ± 1 week up to 72 weeks, then q12w ± 1 week up to 96 weeks, and then q24w thereafter until PD, up to DCO date 15 January 2024 (a maximum of approximately 1936 days))
  • Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab Combination Versus Placebo: Objective Response Rate Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1(From date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to approximately 89 months)
  • Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab Combination Versus Placebo: Time to Death or Distant Metastasis (TTDM) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1(Response evaluations performed q8w ± 1 week up to 72 weeks, then q12w ± 1 week up to 96 weeks, and then q24w thereafter until PD, up to approximately 89 months)
  • Durvalumab Versus Placebo: Percentage of Participants Progression-Free at 18 Months Following Randomization (PFS18) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1(Month 18)
  • Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab Combination Versus Placebo: Percentage of Participants Progression-Free at 18 Months Following Randomization Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1(Month 18)
  • Durvalumab Versus Placebo: Percentage of Participants Progression-Free at 24 Months Following Randomization (PFS24) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1(Month 24)
  • Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab Combination Versus Placebo: Percentage of Participants Progression-Free at 24 Months Following Randomization Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1(Month 24)
  • Durvalumab Versus Placebo: Percentage of Participants Alive at 24 Months From Randomization (OS24)(Month 24)
  • Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab Combination Versus Placebo: Percentage of Participants Alive at 24 Months From Randomization(Month 24)
  • Durvalumab Versus Placebo: Percentage of Participants Alive at 36 Months From Randomization (OS36)(Month 36)
  • Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab Combination Versus Placebo: Percentage of Participants Alive at 36 Months From Randomization(Month 36)
  • Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab Combination Versus Placebo: Time From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2)(Response evaluations performed q8w ± 1 week up to 72 weeks, then q12w ± 1 week up to 96 weeks, and then q24w thereafter until PD, up to approximately 89 months)
  • Durvalumab Versus Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab: Progression-Free Survival Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1(Response evaluations performed q8w ± 1 week up to 72 weeks, then q12w ± 1 week up to 96 weeks, and then q24w thereafter until PD, up to approximately 89 months)
  • Durvalumab Versus Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab: Objective Response Rate Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1(From date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to approximately 89 months)
  • Durvalumab Versus Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab: Overall Survival(From date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to approximately 89 months)
  • Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab Versus Placebo: Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Symptoms as Assessed by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ)(Baseline (Day 1) and up to approximately 89 months)
  • Durvalumab: Serum Concentration of Durvalumab(End of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, pre-infusion on Cycle 2 (Week 4), Cycle 5 (Week 16) and Cycle 26 (Week 100) and Month 3 post last dose of study treatment (Week 119) (each treatment cycle is 28 days))
  • Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab: Serum Concentration of Tremelimumab(Up to approximately 27 months)
  • Durvalumab: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab(From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to DCO date 15 January 2024 (a maximum of approximately 1936 days))
  • Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Tremelimumab(Up to approximately 30 months)
  • Durvalumab Versus Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Status Based on Progression-Free Survival, Overall Survival, and Objective Response Rate(Up to approximately 89 months)

研究者

发起方
AstraZeneca
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

相关资讯

Durvalumab Shows Clinical Promise but Faces Cost-Effectiveness Hurdles in China's Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment- Durvalumab consolidation therapy extends quality-adjusted life years by 0.44 compared to placebo in limited-stage small cell lung cancer patients following chemoradiotherapy. - The treatment's incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $245,591.59 per QALY significantly exceeds China's willingness-to-pay thresholds of $12,569.82-$37,709.46 per QALY. - A 30% price reduction could improve cost-effectiveness by 30.3%, suggesting policy interventions like price negotiations may be necessary for broader access. - Despite clinical benefits demonstrated in the ADRIATIC Phase III trial, current pricing makes durvalumab economically unviable for routine use in China without substantial cost reductions.10 months agoCHMP Backs Durvalumab for Limited-Stage SCLC Following Chemoradiation SuccessThe European Medicines Agency's CHMP has recommended approval of durvalumab (Imfinzi) as monotherapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer patients whose disease hasn't progressed after chemoradiation therapy. The recommendation is based on the phase 3 ADRIATIC trial results, which demonstrated a 27% reduction in death risk and significant improvement in progression-free survival compared to placebo.last yearFDA Approves Obecabtagene Autoleucel for R/R B-ALL; Advances in SCLC and Multiple Myeloma Highlighted- The FDA approved obecabtagene autoleucel (obe-cel) for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) based on the phase 1b/2 FELIX trial data. - Tarlatamab and lurbinectedin are shifting the treatment landscape for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) due to their improved toxicity profiles. - LBL-034, a bispecific antibody targeting GPRC5D and CD3, received orphan drug designation for multiple myeloma treatment and is being evaluated in a phase 1/2 trial.last yearSCLC Treatment Landscape Evolves with Tarlatamab Approval and Promising Trial Results- The FDA approved tarlatamab in May 2024 for SCLC that has progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy, marking a new treatment option in the second-line setting. - The ADRIATIC trial demonstrated that consolidation durvalumab significantly improved PFS and OS in patients with limited-stage SCLC after chemoradiation. - The IMforte trial showed that lurbinectedin combined with atezolizumab led to significant benefits in overall survival and progression-free survival as a maintenance therapy. - Research is exploring novel agents like B7-H3 targeted antibody-drug conjugates and DLL3-targeted bispecific T-cell engagers to further improve SCLC treatment outcomes.last yearDurvalumab Improves Survival in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Subgroups- Durvalumab consolidation therapy shows improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in LS-SCLC patients, regardless of prior prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). - In patients who received carboplatin, durvalumab significantly improved median OS (NR vs 33.4 months) and PFS (27.9 months vs 9.2 months) compared to placebo. - Durvalumab's safety profile is manageable, with pneumonitis incidences similar to placebo, supporting its use as a new standard of care for LS-SCLC. - The ADRIATIC trial's post-hoc analysis confirms durvalumab's consistent benefit across various subgroups, reinforcing its role in LS-SCLC treatment.2 years ago