MedPath

Study on Cemented Versus Non-cemented Hemiarthroplasty in Elderly With Hip Fractures

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Hip Fracture
Interventions
Procedure: cemented Landos prosthesis vs. uncemented Landos prosthesis
Registration Number
NCT00800124
Lead Sponsor
Sykehuset Innlandet HF
Brief Summary

The objective is to study the overall frequency and cumulative rate (during one year) of clinical morbidity (defined as any hospitalization without fatal outcome) and mortality in all consecutive patients undergoing HF surgery (pins and prosthetic implants) and compare this to the group of patients receiving prosthetic implants and further find out if there is a difference between the non-cemented and cemented groups.

Between the same prosthetic groups, the investigators want to study the overall frequency of in-hospital subclinical organ damage and dysfunction of myocardium, liver and lungs, using biochemical plasma markers. Finally, the investigators want to perform perioperative cost benefit calculations and out of hospital quality of life analysis between the surgical groups.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
334
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient with Garden 3 or 4 fracture in acute hip fractures.
  • Age over 75 years.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient or relative refuse enrollment

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
2cemented Landos prosthesis vs. uncemented Landos prosthesisNon-cemented hemiprosthesis
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mortality1 year after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Sykehuset Innlandet, Elverum

🇳🇴

Elverum, Hedmark, Norway

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath