MedPath

Alcohol Biosensor Monitoring for Alcoholic Liver Disease

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Alcohol Use, Unspecified
Interventions
Behavioral: Enhanced Usual Care
Behavioral: Feedback
Registration Number
NCT03533660
Lead Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Brief Summary

Successful treatment of alcohol associated liver disease (AALD) depends primarily on abstinence from alcohol. The investigators propose a randomized clinical trial of alcohol biosensor monitoring for patients with alcohol associated liver disease to determine if monitoring with feedback on alcohol use patterns reduces alcohol consumption and improves outcomes.

Detailed Description

The investigators propose a 3 month randomized controlled trial (RCT) pilot of alcohol biosensor monitoring (ABM)(WrisTAS) for patients with Alcohol Associated Liver Disease (AALD) who intend to stop drinking. All participants will wear the ABM device but participants will be randomized to receive either personalized feedback on the data recorded on the device (n=30) or enhanced usual care without feedback on device data (n=30). The investigators will determine whether ABM plus feedback improves outcomes for AALD patients compared to enhanced usual care and hypothesize ABM feedback will reduce alcohol consumption, improve motivation and self-efficacy for abstinence and improve engagement in treatment. The investigators will also conduct research including qualitative data collected from participants who will provide opinions on ABM feasibility, acceptability, and usability. Qualitative methods are especially useful for understanding the perceived needs, barriers, and preferences for monitoring alcohol use and are especially required for future translation of this technology into clinical practice.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
33
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with AALD followed at our liver disease clinic,
  • 18 years or older,
  • willing to accept randomization,
  • and agree to wear device for 3 months,
  • SOCRATES problem recognition subscale score >26 (scores <26 indicate very low recognition of an alcohol problem).
Exclusion Criteria
  • Non-English speaking,
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) scores <21 (moderate cognitive impairment) or neurologic diseases (e.g. Parkinson's),
  • patients with unresponsive acute alcoholic hepatitis, multi-organ failure, fulminant hepatic failure,
  • cancer/terminal illness;
  • those unable to wear a wrist monitor (e.g., edema);
  • lacking a residence, or unable to identify a contact person (if lost to follow-up).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Enhanced usual careEnhanced Usual CareParticipant will receive information about remaining abstinent and about treatment resources
FeedbackFeedbackParticipant will receive a brief feedback on data downloaded from the ABM and information about treatment resources
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Alcohol Usecontinuous for up to 3 months

Average number of drinks per drinking episode per interval (month) of device wear. We analyzed the number of drinks per drinking episode and present the group average per month interval of assessment.

Percent of Days Drinking Per Interval of Device Wear3 months

Percent of days drinking per interval of device wear: We analyzed the data by number of drinking episodes per individual per days of device wear and present the mean percent days drinking per assessment interval

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Improved Readiness for Alcohol Abstinence and Initiation of ChangeScores determined at initiation, 6 weeks and 3 months of participation

Stages of Change Readiness \& Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES) is a 19-item instrument that measures readiness for change assessing three areas; ambivalence, recognition, and taking steps with change scores assessing the impact of an intervention on these areas. Three subscale scores are produced with total scores ranging 19-95 and higher score indicating greater readiness:

* 7 items for recognition of an alcohol problem (scores range from low of 7 to highest of 35)

* 4 items for ambivalence (range from low of 4 to highest of 20)

* 8 items for taking steps to make a positive change in drinking (range from low of 8 to highest of 40)

Self Efficacy to Remain AbstinentScores determined at initiation, 6 weeks and 3 months of participation

Alcohol Abstinence Self-efficacy (AASE) evaluates confidence in ability to abstain from drinking in situations that represent typical drinking cues. Four subscales with 5 specific situations each are rated on confidence not to drink in each situations on a 5-point Likert scale from 1=not at all confident to 5=extremely confident. Total scores range from 20-100 with higher scores reflecting greater self confidence not to drink.

* negative affect situations (range from low confidence of 5 to highest confidence of 25)

* social/positive situations (range from low confidence of 5 to highest confidence of 25)

* physical and other concerns situations (range from low confidence of 5 to highest confidence of 25)

* cravings and urges situations (range from low confidence of 5 to highest confidence of 25)

Medical OutcomesCounts determined at initiation, 6 weeks and 3 months of participation

AALD related hospitalizations and ER visits - total count of participants in each arm who experienced these outcomes

Qualitative Interviewsmeasured at three months (completion of the participants use of ABM)

Qualitative interviews of participants will use a semi-structured script of open-ended stem questions with prompts. The qualitative assessment will cover such topics as patients' perceived need/psychologic barriers (e.g., beliefs in value of ABM in their clinical care and for their relationship with clinicians) and experience with ABM (e.g., wearability, satisfaction, and barriers to monitoring). Transcribed interviews will be thematically coded. The constant comparison method will be used, and subsequent interviews may be modified/informed by findings from previous interviews to explore emerging themes as the analysis proceeds.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

🇺🇸

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath