Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03819764
NCT03819764
Completed
Not Applicable

Cost-effectiveness and Efficacy of a Combined Intervention to Facilitate Motor Recovery Following Stroke

The Cleveland Clinic1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentApril 11, 2019

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Stroke
Sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
9 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether aerobic exercise improves the participant's ability to recover function in the arm and leg affected by the participant's stroke. The investigators are also calculating the cost effectiveness of the rehabilitation interventions.

Detailed Description

The aims of the study are to determine the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of combining aerobic exercise training with upper extremity motor task practice to improve motor recovery following stroke. It is hypothesized that the neurophysiologic impact of aerobic exercise may augment motor recovery associated with motor task practice. To test this hypothesize, 60 individuals with chronic stroke will be recruited to participate in this randomized clinical trial. Following screening and informed consent, all participants will undergo an exercise stress test to determine response to maximal exertion. Following the stress test, baseline clinical assessments will be obtained to quantify upper extremity function, gait, endurance, and self-reported quality of life. Additionally, variables to determine degree of disability will be obtained. Individuals will be randomized to one of two interventions: 45 min of forced-rate aerobic exercise paired with 45 min of upper limb repetitive task practice or two back-to-back 45-minute sessions of upper limb repetitive task practice. The interventions will occur 3 times per week for 8 weeks. Outcomes assessing motor function and disability will be repeated at mid-treatment, end of treatment, and at 4 weeks, 6-months and 12-months following end of treatment.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 11, 2019
End Date
January 31, 2024
Last Updated
9 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Susan Linder

Project Scientist, Principle Investigator

The Cleveland Clinic

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • ≥ 6 months following single ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed with neuroimaging,
  • Fugl-Meyer motor score 19-55 in the involved upper extremity,
  • Ambulatory ≥ 20 meters with no more than contact guard assistance, and
  • 18-85 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria

  • hospitalization for myocardial infarction, heart failure or heart surgery within 3 months,
  • cardiac arrhythmia,
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,
  • severe aortic stenosis,
  • pulmonary embolus,
  • significant contractures,
  • anti-spasticity injection within 3 months of enrollment and
  • other contraindication to exercise

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)

Time Frame: end of treatment +1 year (14 months from Baseline)

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment is a 33 item assessment of post-stroke upper extremity impairment. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-66, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

Time Frame: end of treatment +1 year (14 months from Baseline)

The Action Research Arm Test is an assessment of post-stroke upper extremity function. Total score is reported, scores range from 0-57, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. The test includes 4 subscales: grasp (6 items, score range 0-18), grip (4 items, score range 0-12), pinch (6 items, score range 0-18), and gross motor (3 items, score range 0-9 ) which are added up for the total score. For all subscales, higher scores indicate better function.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)(end of treatment (8 weeks from baseline))
  • Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)(end of treatment +1 year (14 months from Baseline))
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)(end of treatment +1 year (14 months from Baseline))
  • Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D)(end of treatment +1 year (14 months from Baseline))
  • Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)(end of treatment +1 year (14 months from Baseline))
  • Paretic Step Length(end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline))
  • Non-Paretic Step Length(end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline))
  • Non-Paretic Single Limb Percentage(end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline))
  • Modified Rankin Scale(end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline))
  • Walking Cadence(end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline))
  • Paretic Single Limb Percentage(end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline))
  • Paretic Knee Range of Motion(end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline))
  • Non-Paretic Knee Range of Motion(end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline))
  • Paretic Ankle Range of Motion(end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline))
  • Non-Paretic Ankle Range of Motion(end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline))
  • Paretic Hip Range of Motion (Sagittal Plane)(end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline))
  • Non-Paretic Hip Range of Motion (Sagittal Plane)(end of treatment (8 weeks from Baseline))
  • Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Functional Ability Score(Baseline)
  • Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Grip Strength(baseline)
  • Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Weight to Box(baseline)
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) Pain Intensity(end of treatment + 12 months (14 months from baseline))

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials