A Single Research Site Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale Pilot Validation Study

Phase 4

Completed

Brief Summary: The purpose of the research study is (1) to rate the taste, texture, appearance, and mixability of 2 different doses of orange flavored cholestyramine compared to orange flavored Tang, (2) rank the importance of the taste, texture, appearance, and mixability when rating cholestyramine and Tang to determine the accuracy and usefulness of a taste test questionnaire.

Detailed Description: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate patient acceptability of 2 doses of orange-flavored generic Questran (cholestyramine) versus orange-flavored Tang Drink Mix (a commercial powdered orange drink without cholestyramine) via 2 BASA scales. A second objective is to assess the 2 different versions of the BASA scale. One version will be unweighted with the score based upon the aggregate score of each acceptability component. A second version will be weighted based upon subjectively-reported importance of the acceptability components. The one main study objective or focus is to determine which version of a BASA scale best differentiates patient acceptability of a bile acid sequestrant (cholestyramine) versus a placebo control powder (containing no bile acid sequestrant) thereby determining which BASA scale is the best validated instrument for future studies in assessing and comparing patient acceptability of bile acid sequestrants.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects or generally healthy volunteers are eligible for inclusion if they meet the following inclusion criteria during the Screening Period:

Men or women 18-70 years of age
In general good health.
Subjects are capable of giving informed consent, or if appropriate, have an acceptable surrogate capable of giving consent on the subject's behalf.
Subjects are willing and readily able to be contacted for post-study safety phone call assessments one to seven days after the single study visit.

Exclusion Criteria

Prior intolerance to bile acid sequestrants
Women who are either pregnant, or who are not practicing any form of birth control.
Prior gastrointestinal surgery
History of ongoing gastrointestinal symptoms (indigestion, constipation, or diarrhea)
History of bowel obstruction, malabsorption, or irritable bowel syndrome
History of esophageal disease
Current or past history of gall bladder disease
Subjects enrolled in another experimental (interventional) protocol within the past 30 days prior to visit 1.
Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
Known history of triglyceride levels > 300 mg/dl.
History of alcohol or drug abuse within 1 year of study entry
Alcohol intake that exceeds more than 2 units of alcohol drinks per day
Blood donation within 8 weeks of the study or anticipation of blood donation during the study.
Exposure to bile acid sequestrants (colesevelam HCl, cholestyramine, colestipol within 30 of visit 1).
Any other situation in which the Investigator makes the judgment that participation in the study would not be in the best interest of the study participant, or in the best interest of providing reliable study data.

Arm && Interventions

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Patient Acceptability of Orange-flavored Generic Questran (Cholestyramine) vs. Tang (a Commercial Powdered Orange Drink) Via 2 Versions of a Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale.	1 Day	The Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability Scale has 4 scoring categories: taste, texture, appearance and mixability. Participants rank each category separately. The best possible score for each category is 5 and the worst possible score is 1.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Weighted vs. Unweighted BASA Scale	1 Day	The total aggregate scores for the complete BASA scale were calculated for Cholestyramine 4g, Cholestyramine 12g, and Tang. The total best possible score was 20 and the total worst possible score was 4. A weighted aggregate BASA scale score was also calculated for the Cholestyramine 4g, Cholestyramine 12g, and Tang. The best possible weighted score was 60 and the worst possible weighted score was 4.