Prospective Assessment of Cost-effectiveness and Side-effects of Depressive Patients Treated With ECT or TCA
- Conditions
- Depressive Disorder, Major
- Interventions
- Procedure: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)
- Registration Number
- NCT05306184
- Lead Sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Brief Summary
Prospective observational cohort study to determine cost-effectiveness of ECT compared to medication in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in the Netherlands.
- Detailed Description
Rationale:
Currently, detailed information on the cost-effectiveness of ECT based on real-world data is lacking, as well as the comparative cost-effectiveness with respect to medication. Reliable information on outcomes of ECT in comparison with antidepressant treatment and its cognitive side-effects is needed for patients and clinicians to make a balanced and shared decision regarding choosing or refraining from ECT.
Objective:
Primary Objective: determine (cost)-effectiveness of ECT compared to medication by determining the impact of treatment for MDD with ECT or TCA on remission rates using a one-year time horizon (trial-based economic evaluation)
Secondary Objective: determine side-effects of ECT compared to medication by determining the impact of treatment with ECT or medication on side-effects and quality of life during a one-year follow-up
Study design: Observational, parallel inception cohort study of patients who will undergo standard clinical care according to current guidelines.
Study population: 110 patients (\>18 yrs.) with a depressive episode (unipolar MDD) who will start ECT (ECT group) and 110 patients (\>18 yrs.) with a depressive episode (unipolar MDD) who will undergo treatment with antidepressants will be recruited from specialized clinics (academic hospital, general hospital and GGz-institute) and followed-up for one year to gather reliable data on efficacy including relapse rates, cost-effectiveness, quality of life and cognitive functioning.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 220
- adult patients (>18 years) with a major depressive disorder who will either start with ECT or medication
- failed response to at least 1 adequate dose-duration trial with antidepressants
- moderate or severe depression (HDRS-17 >16)
- lifetime diagnosis schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, current substance abuse disorder, organic brain syndrome
- the presence of a concurrent significant medical condition impeding the ability to participate
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description ECT group Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) 110 participants with primary diagnosis of moderate to severe major depressive disorder receiving ECT as treatment
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Effectiveness of treatment as measured by reduction on HDRS-17 change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months Depression severity measured by The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 item version (HDRS-17)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cognitive functioning as measured by Montreal Cognitive Assesment (MoCA) change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months Cognitive functioning as measured by Montreal Cognitive Assesment (MoCA)
Cost-effectiveness as measured with The Trimbos Institute and iMTA Cost questionnaire for Psychiatry (TiC-P) change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months Cost-effectiveness as measured with The Trimbos Institute and iMTA Cost questionnaire for Psychiatry (TiC-P)
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORY INTERVIEW SHORT FORM (CU-AMI-SF) change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months Subjective Assessment of Memory Impairment (SAMI) change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months Subjective Assessment of Memory Impairment (SAMI)
Quality of life as measured with the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L) change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months Quality of life as measured with the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
15 words test (15WT) change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months (15WT; Saan \& Deelman, 1986)
Verbal fluency test (e.g., Lezak et al., 2012). change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months It typically consists of two tasks: category fluency (sometimes called semantic fluency; Benton, 1968) and letter fluency (sometimes called phonemic fluency; Newcombe, 1969). participants are given 1 min to produce as many unique words as possible within a semantic category (category fluency) or starting with a given letter (letter fluency).
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
GGz inGeest
🇳🇱Amsterdam, Netherlands
RadboudUMC
🇳🇱Nijmegen, Netherlands