Comparing the efficacy of LM ErgoMax and Hu-friedy instruments in deep cleaning.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitis
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/09/036951
- Lead Sponsor
- Hari Priya
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Minimum of 20 teeth in the mouth .
Patients have not received any periodontal treatment in the last six months to 1 year.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases.
Physically and Mentally Challenged individuals
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie the efficacy of LM ErgoMax in periodontal debridement compared to traditional hand instruments?
How does LM ErgoMax compare to Hu-friedy instruments in removing subgingival biofilm in chronic periodontitis patients?
Are there specific biomarkers that correlate with improved clinical outcomes following non-surgical periodontal therapy using LM ErgoMax?
What adverse events are associated with LM ErgoMax instrumentation versus conventional scaling techniques in periodontal treatment?
What evidence supports the use of LM ErgoMax over standard curettes for root planing in chronic periodontitis (K053) management?