Zirconia Vs Titanium Implants in Deficient Ridges
- Conditions
- Alveolar Bone LossPeriodontitis
- Interventions
- Device: Titanium implantDevice: Zirconia implant
- Registration Number
- NCT04375839
- Lead Sponsor
- SVS Institute of Dental Sciences
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate clinically and radiographically soft tissue around single-implant crowns and peri-implant bone resorption respectively by using zirconia implants or titanium implants in horizontally deficient partially edentulous ridges.
- Detailed Description
Experimental: Main treatment group Zirconia implants will be placed in a prosthetically guided position in horizontally deficient ridges in main treatment group.
Active Comparator: Control group Titanium implants will be placed in a prosthetically guided position in horizontally deficient ridges in control group.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 24
Based on the classification of alveolar ridge width given by Tolstunov, subjects with
- partially edentulous (2/3 teeth missing)
- systemically healthy subjects within the age group of 25-44 years
- Class III ridges characterized by moderate i.e., 4-6mm of alveolar ridge width will be included.
-
Medically compromised patients
-. Subjects who underwent radiotherapy or chemotherapy and with
-
Habit of smoking, tobacco and alcohol abuse
-
Subjects with active periodontal disease to residual dentition and lack of oral hygiene will be excluded from this study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Control group Titanium implant Titanium implants will be placed in a prosthetically guided position in horizontally deficient ridges in control group. Main treatment group Zirconia implant Zirconia implants will be placed in a prosthetically guided position in horizontally deficient ridges in main treatment group.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Peri-implant bone resorption Baseline to 6 months measured in terms of vertical bone levels present mesial and distal to implant which will be measured by comparing CBCT
Evaluation of the soft tissue around single implant crowns Baseline to 6 months Pink Esthetic Score (0-2; increasing scores means improvement in clinical outcomes) is used to evaluate the soft tissue around single implant crowns that might change over time at 3 months and 6 months.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Implant survival rate Baseline to 6 months Implant survival rate before and after prosthetic loading based on Criteria: A) Persistent pain or dysesthesia B) Peri-implant infection with suppuration C) Absence of mobility D) Absence of continuous peri-implant radiolucency, but with peri-implant bone resorption assessed using dichotomous scale.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
SVS Institute of Dental Sciences
🇮🇳Hyderabad, Telangana, India