MedPath

Zirconia Vs Titanium Implants in Deficient Ridges

Not Applicable
Conditions
Alveolar Bone Loss
Periodontitis
Interventions
Device: Titanium implant
Device: Zirconia implant
Registration Number
NCT04375839
Lead Sponsor
SVS Institute of Dental Sciences
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate clinically and radiographically soft tissue around single-implant crowns and peri-implant bone resorption respectively by using zirconia implants or titanium implants in horizontally deficient partially edentulous ridges.

Detailed Description

Experimental: Main treatment group Zirconia implants will be placed in a prosthetically guided position in horizontally deficient ridges in main treatment group.

Active Comparator: Control group Titanium implants will be placed in a prosthetically guided position in horizontally deficient ridges in control group.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
24
Inclusion Criteria

Based on the classification of alveolar ridge width given by Tolstunov, subjects with

  • partially edentulous (2/3 teeth missing)
  • systemically healthy subjects within the age group of 25-44 years
  • Class III ridges characterized by moderate i.e., 4-6mm of alveolar ridge width will be included.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Medically compromised patients

    -. Subjects who underwent radiotherapy or chemotherapy and with

  • Habit of smoking, tobacco and alcohol abuse

  • Subjects with active periodontal disease to residual dentition and lack of oral hygiene will be excluded from this study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Control groupTitanium implantTitanium implants will be placed in a prosthetically guided position in horizontally deficient ridges in control group.
Main treatment groupZirconia implantZirconia implants will be placed in a prosthetically guided position in horizontally deficient ridges in main treatment group.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Peri-implant bone resorptionBaseline to 6 months

measured in terms of vertical bone levels present mesial and distal to implant which will be measured by comparing CBCT

Evaluation of the soft tissue around single implant crownsBaseline to 6 months

Pink Esthetic Score (0-2; increasing scores means improvement in clinical outcomes) is used to evaluate the soft tissue around single implant crowns that might change over time at 3 months and 6 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Implant survival rateBaseline to 6 months

Implant survival rate before and after prosthetic loading based on Criteria: A) Persistent pain or dysesthesia B) Peri-implant infection with suppuration C) Absence of mobility D) Absence of continuous peri-implant radiolucency, but with peri-implant bone resorption assessed using dichotomous scale.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

SVS Institute of Dental Sciences

🇮🇳

Hyderabad, Telangana, India

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath