comparison of clinical outcomes between graft obtained from palate with a commercial membrane obtained from pigs in surgical management of receding gums
Not Applicable
Completed
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/04/024626
- Lead Sponsor
- Tinu George P
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 12
Inclusion Criteria
Patients with millers class I and II labial/ buccal recession defects in maxillary anteriors and premolars
Minimum recession depth of �2mm
Systematically healthy patients
Exclusion Criteria
Millers class III and IV gingival recession
Recession sites with probing pocket depth � 4mm
Teeth with mobility
Teeth with prosthetic restorations
Teeth with traumatic occlusion
Patient known allergic response with Porcine derived food substances
Smokers
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.To evaluate and compare Recession height within and between the treatment groups from baseline to 6 months post therapyTimepoint: 3 months and 6 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.To evaluate and compare percentage of root coverage between groups at the end of 6 months <br/ ><br>2.To evaluate and compare Gingival phenotype at the end of the therapy <br/ ><br>3.To compare the Visual analogue scale Esthetic scores at the end of the therapyTimepoint: 6 months