Fibromyalgia: Interventions for Pain and Mood Regulation
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 170
- 主要终点
- Bodily Pain
研究概览
简要总结
This study compares the impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy for pain (CBT-P), mindful awareness and acceptance treatment (M), and arthritis education as an active control condition (E) on mental and physical health outcomes among adults with chronic pain due to fibromyalgia (FM).
详细描述
Both cognitive-behavioral and mindful-acceptance based treatments impact pain and disability in people with chronic pain conditions like fibromyalgia. However, these treatments target different mechanisms. The focus of CBT is on helping individuals manage their thoughts and behaviors related to pain. In contrast, the focus of M is on improving individuals' ability be aware of and accept their experiences, and to develop their positive emotional resources.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Pain in at least 11 of 18 tenderpoints
- •Able to participate in study assessments and group-based meetings
- •Willing to be randomized to treatment condition
排除标准
- •Unable to understand written and spoken English
- •Involved in pain-related litigation
- •Currently involved in psychological treatment for pain and/or mood symptoms
结局指标
主要结局
Bodily Pain
时间窗: Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup
Assessed via the SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.
Depressive symptoms
时间窗: Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, 12-mo followup
Assessed via the Hamilton Depression Inventory (Reference: Reynolds WM, Kobak KA. Reliability and validity of the Hamilton Depression Inventory: A paper-and-pencil version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Clinical Interview. Psychological Assessment 1995; 7(4): 472-83.
Physical Functioning
时间窗: Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup
Assessed via the SF-36 physical functioning subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36: I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.
Vitality
时间窗: Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup
Assessed via the SF-36 Vitality subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.
Social Functioning
时间窗: Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup
Assessed via the SF-36 Social Functioning subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Mary Davis
Professor
Arizona State University