Comparison of tibial (bone) route with peripheral venous route for fluid resuscitation of patients in hypovolemic shock
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: R571- Hypovolemic shock
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/08/035517
- Lead Sponsor
- VMMC SAFDARJUNG HOSPITAL NEW DELHI
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patients weighing >40 kg.
Patients with hypovolemic shock of class II or more (both traumatic and non-traumatic causes),
i.e. (fluid loss >15% of total blood volume or >750mL, Heart Rate >100 BPM,
Respiratory Rate >20/min)
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with already established peripheral vascular access or with previous attempt of
IO access in the target bone within past 48 hours.
Patients having a fractured target bone or a prosthetic target limb.
Patients with infection or burn at the insertion site.
Patients who have undergone a recent surgical procedure in the target limb.
Patients having metabolic bone diseases such as osteogenesis imperfecta and osteoporosis.
Patients having shock due to causes other than hypovolemia
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the first attempt success rates and time taken to establish an initial vascular <br/ ><br>access via tibial intraosseous route and peripheral intravenous route in adult patients <br/ ><br>presenting with hypovolemic shock of class II or more in the emergency departmentTimepoint: every 15 minutes for 2 hours. <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the ease of establishment of tibial intraosseous route of vascular access with <br/ ><br>peripheral intravenous route in adult patients presenting with hypovolemic shock of class <br/ ><br>II in the emergency department using five-point Likert scale.Timepoint: every 15 minutes for 2 hours. <br/ ><br>