Comparing outcomes between the use of autologous fascia lata graft versus synthetic polypropylene mesh for sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of apical vaginal prolapse
- Conditions
- Pelvic organ prolapseRecurrent pelvic organ prolapseRenal and Urogenital - Other renal and urogenital disordersReproductive Health and Childbirth - Other reproductive health and childbirth disordersSurgery - Other surgery
- Registration Number
- ACTRN12624000651583
- Lead Sponsor
- Gold Coast Health
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Patients assessed by subspecialist Urogynaecologist (Certificate of Urogynaecology - RANZCOG) who are candidates for sacrocolpopexy treatment for apical vaginal prolapse
- Care at one of the three sites: Varsity Lakes/Robina Hospital, Pindara Private Hospital or Greenslopes Private Hospital
- Who have their care between 1st April 2023 – 1st April 2028
Those not appropriate for sacrocolpopexy surgery
Those unable to understand the study and/or provide informed consent
Those having care at sites not listed for the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Composite outcome of success” defined as the absence of:<br>1.Descent of apex more than 1/3 of vaginal canal<br>2.Anterior or posterior descent beyond hymen<br>3.bothersome vaginal bulge symptoms<br>4.retreatment for Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with pessary and/or surgery<br>[Clinical - patient history and examination. Information will be collected by medical practitioners at scheduled patient visits. Examination will be completed by a Urogynaecologist or Urogynaecology Accredited Trainee. The information will be recorded in the patient's electronic record and then data will be collated by the research fellow and team. Assessed at 6 weeks, 6 months, then yearly for 5 years (post-surgery - primary timepoint) ]
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method