MedPath

Comparison of QoR-15 in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Sugammadex vs. Neostigmine

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal Agent
Sugammadex
Quality of Recovery
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Neostigmine
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04332627
Lead Sponsor
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Brief Summary

The quality of recovery in patients who were reversed neuromuscular blockade by using Sumamadex and Neostigmine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy was compared through the QoR(Quality of Recovery)-15 questionnaire.

Detailed Description

Quality of Recovery questionnaire includes five details (Emotional status, Physical comfort, Physiological support, Physical independece, Pain), and is a proven method of reliability, consistency and validity for evaluating recovery from surgery and anesthesia.

After laparoscopic cholecystectomy, patients experience various discomforts such as pain, nausea, vomiting, and placebo due to general anesthesia.

Neostigmine has side effects such as crampy abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. In addition, residual neuromuscular blockade was higher in neostigmine compared with sugammadex.

Although sugammadex expected to improve patient's recovery, it is still controversial that sugammadex contributes to clinically meaningfull difference compared with neostigmine.

Therefore, the aim of our study is comparison of quality of recovery through QoR-15 questionnaire in patients who were reversed neuromuscular blockade by using sugammadex and neostigmine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
77
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy aged 20-70
Exclusion Criteria
  • neuromuscular disease
  • allergy to rocuronium, sugammadex, neostigmine
  • cognitive impairment ( disable to answer the questionnaire )
  • refuse to participate

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
sugammadexSugammadexsugammadex 2mg/kg or 4mg/kg according to Train-of-four count (TOF 0 : 4mg/kg, TOF 1-4 : 2mg/kg)
neostigmineNeostigminewith glycopyrrolate 0.4mg, neostigmine 0.02mg/kg or 0.04mg/kg or 0.05mg/kg according to Train-of-four count (TOF 0 : wait until TOF 2, TOF2-3: 0.05mg/kg, TOF4: 0.04mg/kg)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 questionnaire scorepreoperative 1 days to postoperative 2 days

the difference of Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 score between preoperative and postoperative 1 and 2 days (minimum value : 0, maximum value : 150, the higher the score, the better the result)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
postoperative pain scoreat postoperative 30minutes, 6hours, 24hours

postoperative pain score measured by 11-point NRS(numerical rating scale) score (minimum : 0, maximum : 11, the lower the score, the lesser pain)

the incidence of administration of postoperative rescue drugperioperative - until 72hours

administration of analgesic drug and anti-emetic drug for postoperative management

hospital staypreoperative - until discharge (usually 48 hours to 72hours)

days of hospital stay

urinary retentionpostoperative - until discharge (usually 48 hours to 72hours)

residual urine \> 300ml diagnosed by bladder ultrasonography

recovery timeperioperative - until 48hours

from injection of sugammadex or neostigmien to extubation and confirm of adequate spontaneous breathing

PACU(post-anesthesia care unit) stay timeperioperative - until 48hours

from entry of PACU to go general ward

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

🇰🇷

Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath