Comparison of QoR-15 in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Sugammadex vs. Neostigmine
- Conditions
- Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal AgentSugammadexQuality of RecoveryLaparoscopic CholecystectomyNeostigmine
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT04332627
- Lead Sponsor
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
- Brief Summary
The quality of recovery in patients who were reversed neuromuscular blockade by using Sumamadex and Neostigmine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy was compared through the QoR(Quality of Recovery)-15 questionnaire.
- Detailed Description
Quality of Recovery questionnaire includes five details (Emotional status, Physical comfort, Physiological support, Physical independece, Pain), and is a proven method of reliability, consistency and validity for evaluating recovery from surgery and anesthesia.
After laparoscopic cholecystectomy, patients experience various discomforts such as pain, nausea, vomiting, and placebo due to general anesthesia.
Neostigmine has side effects such as crampy abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. In addition, residual neuromuscular blockade was higher in neostigmine compared with sugammadex.
Although sugammadex expected to improve patient's recovery, it is still controversial that sugammadex contributes to clinically meaningfull difference compared with neostigmine.
Therefore, the aim of our study is comparison of quality of recovery through QoR-15 questionnaire in patients who were reversed neuromuscular blockade by using sugammadex and neostigmine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 77
- patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy aged 20-70
- neuromuscular disease
- allergy to rocuronium, sugammadex, neostigmine
- cognitive impairment ( disable to answer the questionnaire )
- refuse to participate
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description sugammadex Sugammadex sugammadex 2mg/kg or 4mg/kg according to Train-of-four count (TOF 0 : 4mg/kg, TOF 1-4 : 2mg/kg) neostigmine Neostigmine with glycopyrrolate 0.4mg, neostigmine 0.02mg/kg or 0.04mg/kg or 0.05mg/kg according to Train-of-four count (TOF 0 : wait until TOF 2, TOF2-3: 0.05mg/kg, TOF4: 0.04mg/kg)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 questionnaire score preoperative 1 days to postoperative 2 days the difference of Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 score between preoperative and postoperative 1 and 2 days (minimum value : 0, maximum value : 150, the higher the score, the better the result)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method postoperative pain score at postoperative 30minutes, 6hours, 24hours postoperative pain score measured by 11-point NRS(numerical rating scale) score (minimum : 0, maximum : 11, the lower the score, the lesser pain)
the incidence of administration of postoperative rescue drug perioperative - until 72hours administration of analgesic drug and anti-emetic drug for postoperative management
hospital stay preoperative - until discharge (usually 48 hours to 72hours) days of hospital stay
urinary retention postoperative - until discharge (usually 48 hours to 72hours) residual urine \> 300ml diagnosed by bladder ultrasonography
recovery time perioperative - until 48hours from injection of sugammadex or neostigmien to extubation and confirm of adequate spontaneous breathing
PACU(post-anesthesia care unit) stay time perioperative - until 48hours from entry of PACU to go general ward
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
🇰🇷Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of