MedPath

EXERCISING TOGETHER for Couples Coping With Cancer

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Stage I Prostate Cancer AJCC v8
Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Colorectal Carcinoma
Breast Carcinoma
Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8
Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8
Stage III Prostate Cancer AJCC v8
Registration Number
NCT03630354
Lead Sponsor
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Brief Summary

The Exercising Together trial is a single-blind, parallel group, randomized controlled trial comparing 3 arms: Arm 1 (experimental): Exercising Together where couples perform partnered exercise in a supervised, group setting versus two comparator conditions where survivors and partners perform exercise routines separately in either a supervised group setting (Arm 2) or unsupervised at home (Arm 3). All three arms will train for a 6-month period and then be followed 6 months later. Data will be collected at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine the efficacy of Exercising Together on relationship quality (intimacy, communication and incongruence) in couples coping with prostate cancer (PC), breast cancer (BC), or colorectal cancer (CRC).

II. Determine the efficacy of Exercising Together on the physical health (body composition, lipids, insulin resistance, blood pressure, inflammation, and physical function) and mental health (anxiety, depressive symptoms, fear of recurrence) of both the survivor and spouse/partner.

III. Determine how long individual and couple-level benefits from Exercising Together last.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:

I. Identify the types of couples that benefit most from Exercising Together.

OUTLINE: Study is a 3-group, 12-month (6 months of exercise training + 6-months follow-up) randomized trial.

ARM I: Exercising Together Program: Couples perform partnered exercise over 1 hour, 2 days per week in a supervised, group setting.

ARM II: Exercising Together Program: Survivors and spouses/partners perform exercise routines separately in a supervised group setting

ARM III: Survivors and partners undergo 2 training sessions over 1 hour with an exercise trainer and then perform exercise routines over 1 hour 2 days per week separately unsupervised at home or a facility following an instructional digital video disc (DVD).

The basic training program for all three study arms is a functional strength training program. Participants will use free weights (weighted vest, dumbbells, elastic bands) while performing lower body (chair rises, squats, lunges, stepups) and upper body (1-arm row, bench press, push-ups, triceps extension, bicep curls, shoulder raise) resistance exercise. Volume of resistance exercise, determined by intensity (weight, tailored to each individual) and duration (number of repetitions and sets), is gradually increased from low weight and high repetitions to more weight and fewer repetitions over the training period.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
496
Inclusion Criteria
  • SURVIVORS ONLY:
  • Histologically confirmed PC, BC or CRC without evidence of metastatic disease (confirmed by self-report on Health History Questionnaire. In the case a participant isn't able to confirm this criterion, a letter will be sent to his or her physician)
  • Three years or less from diagnosis date, by month and year, at time of enrollment (confirmed by self-report on Health History Questionnaire. In the case a participant isn't able to confirm this criterion, a letter will be sent to his or her physician)
  • Completed treatment (e.g., surgery, radiation and/or chemotherapy) >= 6 weeks prior to enrollment. Concurrent adjuvant hormone therapy is permitted and must have been initiated >= 6 weeks prior to enrollment. For prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may constitute primary treatment and must have been initiated >= 6 weeks prior to enrollment. For breast cancer, hormone therapy may constitute primary treatment and must have been initiated >= 6 weeks prior to enrollment. (confirmed by self-report on Health History Questionnaire. In the case a participant isn't able to confirm this criterion, a letter will be sent to his or her physician)
  • Co-residing with an intimate partner or spouse who is willing to participate (confirmed by self-report on Health History Questionnaire)
  • SURVIVORS AND SPOUSES/PARTNERS:
  • Underactive (< 2 strength training sessions per week, lasting 30 minutes or more per session, at a moderate intensity in the last month) (confirmed by self-report on Health History Questionnaire or by discretion of the principal investigator)
Exclusion Criteria
  • SURVIVORS AND SPOUSES/PARTNERS
  • Cognitive difficulties that preclude answering the survey questions, participating in the exercise classes or performance tests, or providing informed consent as determined by the professional opinion of the principal investigator, Dr. Kerri Winters-Stone
  • A medical condition, movement or neurological disorder, or medication use that contraindicates participation in moderate intensity exercise. Specific contraindications include the following: declared pregnancy, poorly controlled diabetes, recent cardiac event, neuromuscular disease, untreated orthostatic hypertension, recent surgery, acute hernia, acute rheumatoid arthritis, severe memory disorders, severe balance disorder, inability to ambulate (use of an assistive device permitted), inability to stand for 3 minutes, severe hearing or vision problem. (For Survivor: Confirmed by physician clearance; For Spouse/Partner: must answer 'No' to American College of Sports Medicine pre-participation screening questions. If spouse/partner answers 'Yes' to either question they will be considered eligible upon physician clearance. Physician clearance may also be requested at the discretion of the principal investigator. For either: absence of pregnancy in persons who could possibly be pregnant but have not declared a pregnancy at screening, will be further screened with a pregnancy test administered at each testing visit.)
  • Knowingly unable to attend > 75% of the intervention classes due to conflict with the designated time of day, days of the week, and/or location for the exercise class which they initially enrolled. (Confirmed by documentation in the Case Report Form titled "CRF - Participant Contact Info_Exercising Together")
  • Not fluent in English and therefore incapable of answering survey questions, participating in class, following directions during performance testing, and providing informed consent when English is the language used. (Confirmed by documentation in the Case Report Form titled "CRF - Participant Contact Info_Exercising Together" or the professional opinion of the Principal Investigator, Dr. Kerri Winters-Stone.)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Dyadic Coping - Active EngagementBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by the Active Engagement subscale from the Relationship Focused Coping Scale. The subscale assesses the degree with which couples practice active engagement by responding to five items on a Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). Scores range from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating more active engagement. Reported values reflect the estimated slope over 6-months.

Dyadic Coping - Protective BufferingBaseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

Measured by the Protective Buffering Subscale from the Relationship Focused Coping Scale. Assesses the degree with which couples practice protective buffering by responding to six items using a Likert scale of 1 (never) to 5 (very often). Scores range from 6 to 30 with higher scores indicating more protective buffering. Reported values reflect the estimated slope over 6-months.

Emotional IntimacyBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by the 7-item Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) to assess each partner's satisfaction with their relationship by answering 7 questions on a 6-point scale ranging from 1(always agree) to 6 (always disagree). Scores range from 0-21 with higher scores indicating better dyadic adjustment. Reported values reflect the estimated slope over 6-months.

Physical Intimacy - Engagement in SexBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by the Physical Intimacy Behavior scale which asks participants the frequency that they engage in sexual behaviors answering two questions on a scale from 1 (none of the time) to 4 (most or all of the time). Scores range from 2 to 8 with higher scores indicating higher physical intimacy.

Physical Intimacy - Engagement in Affectionate BehaviorsBaseline, 3, 6, and 12-months

Measured by the Physical Intimacy Behavior scale which asks participants the frequency that they engage in affectionate behaviors answering four questions on a scale from 1 (none of the time) to 4 (most or all of the time). Scores range from 4 to 16 with higher scores indicating higher physical intimacy.

Concealment of SymptomsBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by the Emotional-Intimacy Disruptive Behavior Scale. Patients report the extent to which they engage in 8 behaviors using a scale from 1 (rarely or none of the time) to 4 (most or all of the time). Scores range from 8-32 where higher scores indicate more concealment Reported values reflect the estimated slope over 6-months.

Pain Incongruence - Pain IntensityBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by the degree of agreement (change or difference) between the survivor and partner ratings of the survivor's pain using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). This instrument has 2 subscales, pain intensity and pain interference. Values from items within each subscale are averaged together to yield scores 0-10. Low values indicate "no pain" and high values represent "pain as bad as you can imagine".

Reported values reflect the estimated slope over 6-months.

Pain Incongruence - Pain InterferenceBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by the degree of agreement (difference) between the survivor and partner ratings of the survivor's pain using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). This instrument has 2 subscales, pain intensity and pain interference. Values from items within each subscale are averaged together to yield scores 0-10. Low values indicate "no pain" and high values represent "pain as bad as you can imagine".

Reported values reflect the estimated slope over 6-months.

Fatigue IncongruenceBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by the degree of agreement (difference) between the survivor and partner ratings of the survivor's fatigue in the past 7 days using the Functional Assessment in Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) fatigue questionnaire. This instrument has 13 items, and possible scores from 0 to 52. Low values indicate no fatigue, while high values indicate high fatigue.

Reported values reflect the estimated slope over 6-months.

Perceived Physical Function IncongruenceBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by the degree of agreement (difference) between the survivor and partner ratings of the survivor's physical function in the past 4 weeks using the perceived physical function subscale of the SF-36 medical outcomes survey. Possible scores range from 0-100. Low scores indicate a high degree of limitation in performing physical activities, whereas high scores represent no limitations in performing physical activities due to health.

Reported values reflect the estimated slope over 6-months.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Body Composition - Bone-free Lean MassBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by bone-free lean (kg) for the whole body determined from a whole body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Hologic-QDR Discovery Wi; APEX software, v.4.02) scan.

Body Composition - Fat MassBaseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

Measured by fat mas (kg) for the whole body determined from a whole body dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Hologic-QDR Discovery Wi; APEX software, v.4.02) scan.

Cardiovascular Health: Serum CholesterolBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by serum fasting total cholesterol.

Cardiovascular Health: Serum TriglyceridesBaseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

Measured by serum triglycerides.

Cardiovascular Health: Insulin ResistanceBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by Homeostasis Model Assessment - Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) - used to assess insulin sensitivity and predict the risk of type 2 diabetes and other metabolic disorders. Calculated as the product of glucose and insulin, obtained from a fasting blood sample, divided by a constant, 405. Scores generally range from 0.5 to 2.5, with lower scores indicating better insulin sensitivity and higher scores suggesting higher insulin resistance. A HOMA-IR score of 1.0 or less is considered optimal, while scores above 2.9 may indicate significant insulin resistance. Reported values reflect the estimated slope over 6-months. (Glucose mg/dL \* insulin uIU/ml) / 405

Cardiovascular Health: Resting Systolic Blood PressureBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by the average of three consecutive resting blood pressure measurements (systolic and diastolic pressures).

Cardiovascular Health: Resting Diastolic Blood PressureBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months

Measured by the average of three consecutive resting blood pressure measurements (systolic and diastolic pressures).

Inflammation-hsCRPBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by serum levels of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) obtained from a fasting blood sample.

Inflammation-TNF AlphaBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) obtained from a fasting blood sample.

Objective Physical FunctionBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by the Physical Performance Battery (PPB) to determine a person's ability to perform daily tasks independently. The PPB consists of 3 timed tests: 5 repeated chair stands, standing balance, and gait speed over 4 meters. Each test is scored 0 (unable) to 4 (completes without difficulty), based on quartiles of performance, then scores are summed. The possible range of scores is 0-12.

Quality of Life (QOL): QLQ-C30 - Physical FunctioningBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measures QOL in cancer patients including subscales of physical functioning. Scores range from 0-100 for overall QOL and subscales where higher scores indicate better functioning.

Quality of Life (QOL): QLQ-C30 - Emotional FunctioningBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months

Measures QOL in cancer patients including subscales of emotional functioning. Scores range from 0-100 for overall QOL and subscales where higher scores indicate better functioning.

Quality of Life (QOL): SF-36 Physical Function SubscaleBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

The SF-36 measures quality of life using 8 subscales: perceived physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, social functioning, bodily pain, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality, and general health perceptions. All subscales have possible scores from 0-100, with items from each subscale averaged together. Low scores indicate worse physical functioning, while higher scores indicate better physical functioning.

Depressive Symptoms: CES-DBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale to determine the degree of depressive symptoms. Scores range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating more symptoms that occur at higher frequencies.

Anxiety: PROMIS Anxiety Short FormBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) anxiety short form 8a, using T score, standardized to mean = 50, SD = 10. Possible range for this short form is 37.1-83.1. Higher T scores reflect higher anxiety. Reported values reflect the estimated slope over 6-months.

Fear of RecurrenceBaseline, 3, 6 and 12 months

Measured by the Fear of Recurrence scale to assess the amount of concern survivors have about their cancer returning in the future. Participants respond to 22 questions ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). The possible range is 22-110. Higher scores reflect higher fear. Reported values reflect the estimated slope over 6-months.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

🇺🇸

Portland, Oregon, United States

OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
🇺🇸Portland, Oregon, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.