A Study of Imatinib Versus Nilotinib in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)
- Registration Number
- NCT00471497
- Lead Sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Brief Summary
In this study, the efficacy and safety of two nilotinib doses, 300 mg twice daily and 400 mg twice daily, were compared with imatinib 400 mg once daily in newly diagnosed patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP).
An extension protocol was included in this study design to allow patients who did not show sufficient response to their assigned treatments the opportunity to receive imatinib 400 mg BID (option available until protocol amendment 7) or nilotinib 400 mg BID, using an abbreviated safety and efficacy assessment schedule.
- Detailed Description
Primary objectives of this study:
* Compared the efficacy (major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months) of nilotinib at 400 mg bid with that of imatinib 400 mg qd in newly diagnosed, previously untreated Ph+ CML-CP patients.
* Compared the efficacy (MMR rate at 12 months) of nilotinib at 300 mg bid with that of imatinib 400 mg qd in newly diagnosed, previously untreated Ph+ CML-CP patients.
The Primary objectives of Extension Phase of the study:
- Characterized the safety and tolerability profile of nilotinib 400 mg BID after failure of imatinib or insufficiently responded to nilotinib 300 mg BID therapy and the safety and tolerability profile of imatinib therapy after failure of nilotinib therapy.
The study was designed to determine whether the treatment of newly diagnosed, previously untreated Ph+ CML-CP patients with either nilotinib 300 mg bid or 400 mg bid demonstrated improved efficacy compared to imatinib 400 mg qd. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of MMR defined as the proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 3 log reduction in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to either the standardized Baseline established in the IRIS trial (International Randomized Interferon versus STI571) (Cortes et al 2005) or to the BCR-ABL ratio ≤ 0.1% by International Scale, as detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) at 12 months.
The key secondary endpoint was to compare the rate of durable MMR between nilotinib 300 mg bid with that of imatinib, and of nilotinib 400 mg bid with that of imatinib at 24 months. This report presents the final results of efficacy and safety at the LPLV (21-Aug-2019).
The main data analysis was done at the time when all patients completed 12 cycles of treatment (or discontinued earlier). There were two primary comparisons at this time point: the MMR rate of nilotinib 400 mg versus the MMR rate of imatinib 400 mg, and the MMR rate of the nilotinib 300 mg versus the MMR rate of the imatinib 400 mg. Comparisons were done sequentially, i.e. the MMR rate of nilotinib 400 mg versus the MMR rate of imatinib 400 mg was to be compared first; if it was significant at 5% level, the MMR rate of the nilotinib 300 mg versus the MMR rate of the imatinib 400 mg was to be compared. The study had a 90% power to detect a 15% difference between the nilotinib 400 mg arm versus imatinib 400 mg arm assuming that the MMR rate of imatinib is 40% and the MMR rate of nilotinib is 55%. The study also had a 90% power to detect a 15% difference between the nilotinib 300 mg and the imatinib 400 mg arms, if the comparison between the nilotinib 400 mg and the imatinib 400 mg was significant.
The second main data analysis was done at the time when all patients completed 24 cycles of treatment (or discontinued earlier). There were two key comparisons at this time point: the rate of durable MMR at 24 months of the nilotinib 400 mg versus the imatinib 400 mg, and the rate of durable MMR at 24 months of the nilotinib 300 mg versus the imatinib 400 mg.
In order to control the overall type I error rate at or below 5%, only when the corresponding comparison on the primary efficacy endpoint(s) was (were) significant, the key secondary comparison(s) of the respective nilotinib doses (400 mg bid and/or 300 mg bid) versus imatinib 400 mg qd were tested at two-sided 5% significance level.
Patients participating after demonstrating suboptimal response/treatment failure to their assigned study treatment in the core study were offered the option to continue in the extension study and to receive imatinib 400 mg bid (option available only until protocol amendment 7) or nilotinib therapy at a dose of 400 mg bid.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 846
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description nilotinib 300mg bid (investigating arm) nilotinib - Nilotinb 400 mg bid (investigating arm) nilotinib - imatinib 400mg QD (control arm) imatinib -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Major Molecular Response Rate (MMR) at 12 Months Between All 3 Arms - With Imputation Baseline, 12 months MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 12 months.
Percentage of Participants With MMR at 12 Months Between All 3 Arms by Sokal Risk Group With Imputation 12 months MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 12 months.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rates of Durable MMR at 24 Months Between All 3 Arms 24 months Durable MMR at 24 months is defined as having MMR both at 12 months and at 24 months, and with no documented loss of MMR between these 12 month and 24 month time points.
Rate of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib at 12 Months and Beyond 12 Months 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 months (M) CCyR is defined as 0% Ph+ metaphases based on at least 20 metaphases from bone marrow cytogenetics. Patients with no CCyR as the best response by any specific time point, all missing cytogenetic evaluations by that time point or Ph- at baseline are combined as "Nocomplete cytogenetic response".
Rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) at 12 Months Between Two Nilotinib Arms 12 months MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 12 months based on 12-month cut-off interim data.
Rate of MMR at 6 Months and Beyond in All 3 Treatment Arms 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 6 months and beyond up to 120 months based on final data.
Rate of a ≥ 4 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months Molecular response of \<=0.01% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS \<= 0.01% (corresponds to \>=4 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value)
Rate of a ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months This is the molecular response of \<=0.0032% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS \<= 0.0032% (corresponds to \>=4.5 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value)
Time to First MMR up to 84 months Time to MMR is defined as time from date of randomization to the date of the first documented MMR in nilotinib treatment arms, compared to imatinib in adult patients with Ph+ CML in CP.
Duration of MMR approx. 11 years Duration of MMR for patients with MMR is defined as the time between date of MMR and the earliest of the following: loss of MMR, CML-related death or progression to AP/BC during study treatment The time will be censored at last molecular assessment (PCR) date for patients for whom none of the above events is reported.
Time to Both a ≥ 4 and ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts up to 84 months Time to BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% is defined as: date of first BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% - date of randomization +1.
Duration of Both a ≥ 4 and ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts approx. 11 years It is defined as the time from the date of first documented BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% to the earliest of the following: Loss of BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032%, respectively, CML-related death or progression to AP/BC during study treatment. The time will be censored at last molecular assessment (PCR) date for patients for whom none of the above events is reported.
Rate of Hematologic Response 12 months, 24 months, Overall on Core study (approx. 11 years) Rate of hematologic response is defined as the percentage of participants in complete hematologic response (defined as the following present for at least 4 weeks: WBC count \<10 x 109/L, Platelet count \<450 x 109/L, Basophils \<5%, No blasts and promyelocytes in peripheral blood, Myelocytes + metamyelocytes \< 5% in peripheral blood, No evidence of extramedullary disease, including spleen and liver).
Time to Complete Cytogenic Response (CCyR) 24 months Time to CCyR is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented CCyR
Duration of CCyR up to 72 months Duration of CCyR is defined as the time from date of first documented CCyR to the earliest date of loss of CCyR.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) approx. 11 years Progression-free survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event defined as the first documented disease progression to AP/BC or the date of death from any cause occurring in the core or extension study, or during the follow-up period after discontinuation of core or extension study
Event-free Survival (EFS) approx. 11 years Event-free survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first occurrence of any of the following: death due to any cause (if death is the primary reason for discontinuation), progression to AP or BC, loss of PCyR, loss of CCyR, loss of CHR
Overall Survival (OS) approx. 11 years OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date death. Up to 10 calendar years of follow up from the date when the last patient randomized received the first dose of study drug in all active treatment arms of adult patients with Ph+ CML CP.
Actual Dose-intensity approx. 11 years Actual dose intensity is defined as total dose over time on treatment
Time to Progression to AP/BC approx. 11 years Time to progression to AP/BC is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event defined as the first documented disease progression to AP/BC or the date of CML related death.
Pharmacokinetics: Cmax any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration Cmax is defined as the maximum serum concentration after dose
Pharmacokinetics: Cmin any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration Cmin is defined as the minimum serum concentration after dose
Pharmacokinetics: Tmax any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration Tmax is defined as the sampling time when maximum measured serum concentration occurs
Pharmacokinetics: AUC0-last any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration AUC0-last is defined as area under concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable sample, calculated by log-linear trapezoidal method
Rate of Hematologic Response on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension) Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years Rate of hematologic response is defined as the percentage of participants in complete hematologic response (defined as the following present for at least 4 weeks: WBC count \<10 x 109/L, Platelet count \<450 x 109/L, Basophils \<5%, No blasts and promyelocytes in peripheral blood, Myelocytes + metamyelocytes \< 5% in peripheral blood, No evidence of extramedullary disease, including spleen and liver).
Rate of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension) Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years Rate of CCyR is defined as the percentage of participants in complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). CcyR is defined as 0% of Ph+ metaphases in the bone marrow.
Rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension) Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years Rate of MMR is defined as the percentage pf participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR))
Rate of ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension) Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years Molecular response of \<=0.0032% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS \<= 0.0032% (corresponds to \>=4.5 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value)
Rate of a ≥ 4 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension) Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years Molecular response of \<=0.01% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS \<= 0.01% (corresponds to \>=4 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value)
Presence of Newly Observed BCR-ABL Mutations in Patients Post-baseline and Correlate With Response to Treatment With Imatinib and Nilotinib (Extension) Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years This is the percentage of patients with any emergent mutation on extension treatment. The mutation comprised of T315T, less sensitive to nilotinib, unknown and sensitive to nilotinib.
Trial Locations
- Locations (32)
University of California at Los Angeles Dept. of Hematology Clinic
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente - California Northern Kaiser Med
🇺🇸Vallejo, California, United States
Florida Cancer Specialists Dept. FloridaCancerSpecialists
🇺🇸Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Kansas City Cancer Center KCCC Business Office
🇺🇸Overland Park, Kansas, United States
University of Chicago Section of Hematology/Oncology
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Cleveland Clinic Foundation CCF
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Kaiser Permanente - California Southern Dept of Kaiser South 3
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
Advanced Medical Specialties Research Dept.
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
University of Cincinnati / Barrett Cancer Center Dept.of Internal Med.
🇺🇸Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Tennessee Oncology Dept. of Centennial Medical
🇺🇸Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Cancer Care Centers of South Texas HOAST CCC of So.TX- Medical Center
🇺🇸San Antonio, Texas, United States
Utah Cancer Specialists
🇺🇸Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Northwest Cancer Specialists Compass Oncology -BKM
🇺🇸Portland, Oregon, United States
Kaiser Permanente - California Northern Vallejo Med Center/Med Offices
🇺🇸Vallejo, California, United States
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers RMCC - Colorado Springs
🇺🇸Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States
Indiana Blood and Marrow Institute Dept. of Indiana Blood&Marrow
🇺🇸Beech Grove, Indiana, United States
Cancer Centers of Florida PA Cancer Centers of FL
🇺🇸Ocoee, Florida, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Dept.of U of Iowa Hosp&Clinics
🇺🇸Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Missouri Cancer Associates Dept. of Boone Hospital Center
🇺🇸Columbia, Missouri, United States
Hematology Oncology Consultants, Inc. Deptof Hem. Onc.Consunsultants
🇺🇸Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
Michigan State University / Breslin Cancer Center Breslin Cancer Center
🇺🇸Lansing, Michigan, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Clinical Trials Office
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
Cancer Centers of the Carolinas CC of C -Eastside
🇺🇸Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Tyler Cancer Center
🇺🇸Tyler, Texas, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
🇻🇪Caracas, Distrito Capital, Venezuela
Hackensack University Medical Center Department of Research
🇺🇸Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Texas Cancer Center ( Medical City Dallas Hospital)
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States
Chattanooga Oncology and Hematology Assoicates, PC Chattanooga Oncology
🇺🇸Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Florida Retina Institute Flordia Cancer Affilates
🇺🇸Orlando, Florida, United States
LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER/ LSU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE Feist-Weiller Cancer Center
🇺🇸New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
University of North Carolina UNC Lineberger Cancer Center
🇺🇸Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Wake Forest University Health Sciences Dept. of Industry Research
🇺🇸Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States