A Study of Nilotinib Versus Imatinib in GIST Patients
- Conditions
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT00785785
- Lead Sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Brief Summary
This study will evaluate efficacy and safety of nilotinib versus imatinib in adult patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 644
-
Histologically confirmed diagnosis of GIST which is unresectable and/or metastatic and either:
- have not received any prior anti-neoplastic therapy other than adjuvant imatinib. Note: newly diagnosed patients may have received up to 14 days of treatment with imatinib for disease management while awaiting entry to the study or
- recurrent GIST after stopping adjuvant treatment with imatinib and no subsequent treatment with any other therapies.
-
At least one measurable site of disease on CT/MRI scan
-
Performance status ≤ 2 (capable of self-care but unable to carry out any work)
-
Normal organ, electrolyte and marrow function
- Any prior anti-neoplastic therapy with the exception of patients who have received adjuvant imatinib or patients with newly diagnosed metastatic/ unresectable GIST whose disease requires therapy while awaiting entry to the study.
- Disease progression during adjuvant therapy with imatinib
- History of active malignancy (other than GIST) within 10 years prior to study entry with the exception of previous or concomitant basal cell skin cancer, previous cervical carcinoma in situ.
- Impaired cardiac function
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Imatinib imatinib (STI571) imatinib 400 mg once daily Nilotinib Nilotinib (AMN107) nilotinib 400 mg twice a day
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to Progression Free Survival (PFS) up to month 37 PFS was defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause. Progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (29)
Birmingham Hematology and Oncology Associates
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Northern Arizona Hematology/Oncology Associates, P.C. Dept. of No. AZ Hem-Onc
🇺🇸Flagstaff, Arizona, United States
City of Hope National Medical Center Dept.ofCityofHopeMedicalCtr(4)
🇺🇸Duarte, California, United States
City of Hope National Medical Center Regulatory Document
🇺🇸Duarte, California, United States
University of California San Diego - Moores Cancer Center Dept of Moores Cancer Ctr (2)
🇺🇸La Jolla, California, United States
University of California at Los Angeles GI Oncology Program
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
Stanford University Medical Center Stanford Cancer Center
🇺🇸Stanford, California, United States
University of Colorado Dept. of Univ. of Colorado
🇺🇸Aurora, Colorado, United States
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers Dept. of Rocky Mountain Cancer
🇺🇸Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States
Washington Hospital Center Wash Hospital
🇺🇸Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Scroll for more (19 remaining)Birmingham Hematology and Oncology Associates🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States