Methadone Maintenance and HIV Prevention: A Window of Opportunity in China Version
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Capacity Building
- Sponsor
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Enrollment
- 220
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Service provider's job satisfaction
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This study is an intervention pilot that integrates the current methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) program in China with psychosocial and behavioral components in order to address the critical link between drug use and HIV/AIDS.
The intervention pilot proceeds in two phases in Sichuan, China. In Phase 1, we developed the intervention manuals and supporting materials, and finalized assessment measures and implementation procedures. In Phase 2, we conducted an intervention pilot across 6 MMT clinics involving 41 service providers and 179 clients, and followed up at three, six, and nine months.
Detailed Description
The implementation of the MMT program in China is one of the most significant measures ever taken by the Chinese government to address drug use and HIV prevention challenges. In 2004, China launched a series of MMT programs at eight pilot clinics in five provinces. By December 2007, 503 MMT clinics had been established nationwide across 23 provinces. Several studies have found that positive outcomes in drug use, criminality, and employment were associated with participation in MMT. However, special challenges are facing the current MMT programs are facing: 1) clients' drop-out rates are high; and 2) providers at MMT clinics do not have sufficient training, and some of them hesitate to serve the population. We have recognized the urgent need and conducted the study to address these challenges. The intervention pilot proceeds in two phases in Sichuan, China. In Phase 1, we developed the intervention manuals and supporting materials, and finalized assessment measures and implementation procedures. In Phase 2, we conducted an intervention pilot across 6 MMT clinics involving 41 service providers and 179 clients, and followed up at three, six, and nine months. The specific aims of the proposed study are: Specific Aim 1: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of the MMT PLUS intervention with process evaluation and participant feedback. Specific Aim 2: To examine primary outcomes on whether service providers in the intervention group, compared to providers in the standard care, will demonstrate improved adherence to MMT protocol, decrease in prejudicial attitudes, increase in comfort working with MMT clients, increase in motivating clients and making personalized risk management plan. Specific Aim 3: To explore secondary outcomes on whether MMT clients in the intervention group, compared to clients in the standard care, will report increased motivation to change, improved psychological and physical health, increased positive support network, and reduced HIV risk behavior. Specific Aim 4: To investigate exploratory outcomes on whether MMT clients in the intervention group, compared to clients in the standard care, will report improved MMT treatment retention and decreased drug use.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Service providers
- •Age 18 and above
- •Currently working in MMT clinic
- •Informed consent
- •MMT clients
- •Age 18 or over
- •Currently enrolled in MMT
- •Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- •Service providers
- •Anyone who does not meet the inclusion criteria.
- •MMT clients:
- •Psychosis, neurological damage, as judged by an interviewer in consultation with a clinical supervisor inability to give informed consent
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Service provider's job satisfaction
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Service provider's prejudical attitude towards drug users
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Provide-client interaction
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Provider's perceived stigma due to work with drug using population
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Service provider's perceived risk at work
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Service provider's perceived institutional support
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Service providers' MMT knowledge
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes
- Client's perceived stigma from MMT clients(Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up)
- Client's drug avoidance self-efficacy(Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up)
- Client's physical health(Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up)
- Client's social support(Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up)
- Client's readiness to change(Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up)
- Client's drug using behavior(Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up)
- MMT client's mental health(Changes from baseline to 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up)