A study to compare three insertion techniques for i-gel placement: standard, reverse and rotation
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 135
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- i-gel is supraglottic airway device which can be insetted by either standard, rotation or reverse techniques. Various insertion characterstics like time of insertion, first attempt success rate are compared in these three techniques of insertion of i-gel.
研究概览
简要总结
In standard technique of i-gel placement i-gel will be inserted with its concave structure facing the mandible and advanced along hard palate, soft palate and posterior pharynx.
In reverse technique i-gel will be inserted with its concavity facing toward hard palate and on reaching hard palate it will be rotated by 180 degree.
In rotation technique i-gel will be inserted in mouth and rotated 90 degree counter clockwise around patients tongue, advanced until resistance is felt and re rotated clockwise to attain final position.
And different insertion characterstics of all three techniques will be compared.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Not Applicable
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 50.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) status I and II patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery in supine position.
排除标准
- •Mouth opening <2.5cm Known difficult airway Risk of aspiration Body mass index >35 kg/m2 Acute sore throat.
结局指标
主要结局
i-gel is supraglottic airway device which can be insetted by either standard, rotation or reverse techniques. Various insertion characterstics like time of insertion, first attempt success rate are compared in these three techniques of insertion of i-gel.
时间窗: specific characterstics of i-gel insertion by three different techniques will be compared at the end of the study
次要结局
- Reverse and rotation techniques prevent tongue folding as compared to standard technique at the time of insertion(insertion characterstics like first attempt success rate, oropharyngeal leak pressure, peak airway pressure, fibreoptic grades of placement are compared)