To check whether palatal anesthesia is needed or not if articaine is used as a buccal infiltration in primary maxillary molars extractio
Phase 3
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K039- Disease of hard tissues of teeth,unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/01/061454
- Lead Sponsor
- Enabothula Sohini
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Cooperative children,
Children with definite indications for bilateral extraction of primary teeth,
Absence of any active pathology at the injection site.
Exclusion Criteria
Parents or caregivers who did not give consent for the study,
Children allergic to lignocaine/ articaine,
Presence of systemic illness,
Children with underlying vascular or immunological disease,
Infection at the site of the injection site,
Children with communication disorders.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Single buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1:1,00,000 adrenaline effectively provides adequate palatal anesthesia for primary teeth extractionTimepoint: 1hour
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To evaluate the pain experienced by the patient using Wong Baker’s Faces pain scale (WBFPS) while administering buccal infiltrations and palatal infiltrations (if needed)Timepoint: 1 hour