CTRI/2022/05/042453Not yet recruiting未知
A comparative study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two different doses of oxytocin boluses in elective caesarean sections.
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- 未知
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesia
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •ASA grade II, Elective LSCS under Spinal Anaesthesia, Singleton pregnancy
Exclusion Criteria
- •Refusal of patient
- •Emergency LSCS
- •History of allergy to oxytocin
- •Placenta previa/accreta
- •Polyhydramnios
- •>2 Previous Caesarean sections
- •Multifetal Pregnancy
- •Contra-indications for Spinal Anaesthesia
- •Inadequate Spinal Anaesthesia or conversion to General Anaesthesia
Investigators
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
se of Baska mask versus Ambu-aura gain in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia : A comparative study.CTRI/2022/07/044255Dr Shalini A
Completed
Phase 2
A comparative study to assess the safety and efficacy of underwater EMR for intermediate size (10-20 mm) colorectal polyps.JPRN-UMIN000018989Osaka international cancer institute230
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Safety of Etoricoxib and Piroxicam oral drugs in Osteoarthritis patients at Rama hospital KanpurCTRI/2022/12/047816PRINC BGHEA
Recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin OCAS with tamsulosin MR and placebo in improving lower urinary tract symptomsIRCT20100817004582N8rology Research Centre, Guilan University of Medical Sciences260
Completed
Phase 4
A comparative study between Whitfields ointment + Oral fluconazole Vs 1% butenafine in tinea infections of skiCTRI/2012/08/002914Department of Pharmacology and Department of Skin and VD CU Shah Medical College and Hospital120