MedPath

High On-treatment Platelet Reactivity Identified by Multiple Platelet Function Assay

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT02699008
Lead Sponsor
Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital
Brief Summary

High on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate was a important reason to cause ischemic events in antiplatelet therapy. Using single testing to definite HPR may miss the "true HPR" or over estimate HPR, which may lead to randomized trials failed. It is not known whether combined multiple platelet function testing could assist to ensure"ture"HPR and improve clinical outcomes.

Detailed Description

This was a single-center, randomized, prospective study. ACS patients undergoing PCI treated with clopidogrel and aspirin were included. in the 3-5th day after prescription of clopidogrel, platelet function were tested simultaneously by three methods: MPAADP by Light transmittance aggregometry(LTA), MAADP by Thrombelastography (TEG) ,and CTP2Y by Innovance PFA-200 . According to three result(Two of three or all three results higher than cutoff value was identified as HPR, MPALTA\>50%;MAADP\>47mm;CTP2Y\<106s).Patients was defined as HPR(n=125) or unHPR(n=232), HPR patients were divided into HPR-Ticagrelor(HPR-T)and HPR-Clopidogrel(HPR-C) randomized. HPR-T group(n=77) patients' antiplatelet agents changed to ticagrelor, both unHPR and HPR-C groups keep unchanged(Clopidogrel). The major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were recorded during 1 year Follow-up.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
477
Inclusion Criteria
  • ACS patients(UAP;USTEMI,STEMI)
  • Undergoing PCI
  • Oral antiplatelet therapy
Exclusion Criteria
  • Stable CAD

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
HPR-Ticagrelor rowTicagrelorACS patients aftergoing PCI treated with clopidogrel and aspirin were included. in the 3-5th day after prescription of clopidogrel, platelet function were tested simultaneously by three methods: Light transmittance aggregometry(LTA), Thrombelastography (TEG) ,Innovance PFA-200 . According to three method results(Two of three or all three results higher than cutoff value was identified as HPR, MPALTA\>50%;MAADP\>47mm;CTP2Y\<106s).Patients was defined as HPR and unHPR, HPR patients were randomized divided into HPR-Ticagrelor(HPR-T) and HPR-Clopidogrel(HPR-C)
HPR-Clopidogrel rowClopidogrelThrombelastography (TEG) ,Innovance PFA-200 . According to three method results(Two of three or all three results higher than cutoff value was identified as HPR, MPALTA\>50%;MAADP\>47mm;CTP2Y\<106s).Patients was defined as HPR and unHPR, HPR patients were randomized divided into HPR-Ticagrelor(HPR-T) and HPR-Clopidogrel(HPR-C)
unHPR rowClopidogrelThrombelastography (TEG) ,Innovance PFA-200 . According to three method results(Two of three or all three results higher than cutoff value was identified as HPR, MPALTA\>50%;MAADP\>47mm;CTP2Y\<106s).Patients was defined as HPR and unHPR, HPR patients were randomized divided into HPR-Ticagrelor(HPR-T) and HPR-Clopidogrel(HPR-C)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Major adverse cardiovascular events1 year

stent thrombosis;ACS;all cause Death;stroke;

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Bleeding events1 year

gastrointestinal bleeding;gastrointestinal bleeding;other bleeding need RBC transfusion

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital

🇨🇳

Wuhan, Hubei, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath