Lisdexamfetamine for Adults With Bulimia Nervosa
- Registration Number
- NCT03397446
- Lead Sponsor
- Aaron Keshen
- Brief Summary
The relatively high rates of bulimia nervosa (BN) in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) cohorts suggest a relationship between the two disorders. Interestingly, case studies involving this comorbid population have observed improvements in BN symptoms when given psychostimulants for ADHD. Case studies involving BN patents without this comorbidity have also demonstrated BN symptom improvements upon psychostimulant initiation. Recent studies have also found support for the use of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, a psychostimulant approved for ADHD, for treating moderate to severe binge eating disorder, an eating disorder akin to BN. Given these findings, there is reason to believe that psychostimulants may also be capable of treating bulimia nervosa.
Ultimately, the investigators would like to conduct a large study that examines whether people who are diagnosed with BN will have fewer episodes of binge eating and purging when they are treated with the psychostimulant medication, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX). However, preliminary data would be helpful prior to undertaking such a large project. To this end, the aim of the current study is to learn more about a) enrolment rates, b) dropout rates, c) the applicability of our eligibility criteria, d) the potential effects of LDX on novel outcome measures for studying decision-making in BN, e) preliminary safety data, and f) estimates of treatment effect.
Participants (n = 30) will be instructed to take LDX once daily for two months while undergoing routine testing and monitoring to gather preliminary safety and treatment data. The research will take place at the Nova Scotia Health Authority Eating Disorder Clinic.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 23
- 18-55 years of age and signed consent
- Diagnosis of moderate to extreme bulimia nervosa (4 or more episodes of compensatory behaviours per week).
- A body mass index (BMI) between 22 and 30 (calculated as kilograms per meters squared).
- Subject is consistently able to swallow a capsule
- If female, not breast feeding and not of child bearing potential (the latter defined as last menstruation at least 24 months prior to baseline, has undergone tubal ligation, and undergone hysterectomy)
- If female of childbearing potential, agree to use a reliable form of birth control and has a negative serum pregnancy test prior to medication initiation.
- A comorbid bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, moderate-severe depression, and/or ADHD using the SCID-4.
- Previous history of anorexia nervosa (e.g., due to the risk of problematic weight loss secondary to stimulant misuse).
- Severly restrictive eating behaviours, defined as routinely (>2 days a week) eating less than 2 meals a day or at the investigator's discretion.
- Clinically meaningful abnormalities in laboratory tests or electrocardiography results (most relevant concerns include electrolyte abnormalities, hypoglycemia, prolonged QTc, hypertension, and tachycardia).
- Personal or family history of cardiovascular disease that could increase the vulnerability to the sympathomimetic effects of stimulants (e.g., structural cardiac abnormalities, cardiomyopathy, serious heart arrhythmia, advanced arteriosclerosis, or coronary artery disease) or any current symptomatic cardiovascular disease, as determined by the PI, and/or in consultation with cardiologist (as needed).
- Subject has moderate to severe hypertension (>140/90 mmHg).
- Subject is receiving psychotherapy for the treatment of BN.
- Subject is taking or has taken a psychostimulant within the past 3 months.
- Subject is taking another psychotropic medication AND the dose has been changed 4 weeks prior to study medication initiation (e.g., baseline).
- Subject is on an antipsychotic medication (due to opposing mechanism of action).
- A suspected history of substance use disorder in the preceding 6 months or more distant (e.g., severe history of prior stimulant abuse) or a lifetime history of stimulant substance use disorder.
- Subject is taking or has taken a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within the last 14 days or has a hypersensitivity to amphetamine products or other ingredients in LDX.
- Subject is pregnant, plans to become pregnant, or is nursing.
- Subject uses syrup of ipecac to self-induce vomiting.
- Subject is considered a suicide risk.
- Subject has a known allergy to amphetamines, or other non-medical ingredients in LDX, or is sensitive to, is allergic to, or has had a reaction to other stimulant medications.
- Subject has been diagnosed with glaucoma (an eye disease).
- Subject has been diagnosed with hyperthyroidism (an overactive thyroid gland).
- Insufficient knowledge of English.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate A central nervous system stimulant, specifically, a prodrug of dextro-amphetamine
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The applicability of eligibility criteria 2 years The applicability of eligibility criteria will be determined by the ratio of participants screened to participants enrolled.
Dropout rates 2 years Dropout rate will be defined as the number of patients whose participation was terminated prior to completion of the post-treatment assessment divided by the total number of participants enrolled.
Enrolment rate 2 years Enrolment rate will be defined as the total number of participants enrolled divided by the total enrolment period in months.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Incidence of serious or other treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) Up to 9 weeks Subjects will be asked to report TEAEs to the research team and PI.
Change from baseline in heart rate (bpm) Up to 9 weeks Heart rate will be collected by a study investigator at weekly/biweekly visits.
Change from baseline in the number of binge eating episodes per week Up to 9 weeks Subjects will record the number of binge eating episodes in a food diary, which will be validated weekly by a clinician using structured questions from the Eating Disorder Examination Interview inquiring about symptom frequency since the previous study visit.
Change in Clinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S) Screening visit, Week 5, Post (End of week 8) A 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis.
Change from baseline in the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) Week 1, Week 5, Post (End of week 8) A 26-item measure of one's confidence in performing coping behaviors when faced with life challenges.
Incidence of abnormalities in EKG Up to 9 weeks Most relevant concerns for patients with BN taking LDX include prolonged QTc, hypertension, and tachycardia.
Percent of treatment responders (binge and purge response rate) Through study completion, up to two years Responders defined as ≥50% reduction in the number of binge and/ or purge episodes from baseline to the last two preceding weeks of treatment.
Percent of binge and purge remission (binge and purge remission rate) Through study completion, up to two years Cessation defined as 100% reduction in binge and/or purge episodes in the last 28 days of treatment.
Change from baseline in the Locus of Control of Behaviour (LCB) Week 1, Week 5, Post (End of week 8) A 17-item measure of the extent to which subjects perceive responsibility for their behaviour.
Incidence of abnormal adherence rates 2 months Adherence will be calculated as the number of pills not returned divided by the number of days since the last visit, multiplied by 100 to yield a percentage. Subjects with an adherence rate between 80% and 120% will be considered adherent to treatment.
Incidence of abnormalities in blood analysis Up to 9 weeks Most relevant concerns for patients with BN taking LDX include electrolyte abnormalities (potassium, sodium, chloride) and hypoglycemia
Incidence of thoughts, ideations, and attempts of suicide, as measured by the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (Since Last Visit Version) Up to 9 weeks A clinician-observed measure designed to assess suicidal ideations and suicidal behaviours since the last visit in clinical trials. The scale consists of 4 sections. Section 1 regards suicidal ideation and consists of 5 "yes" or "no" questions. Section 2 regards the intensity of ideation and asks the patient to describe their most severe ideation. In regard to that ideation, the patient then indicates frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reasons for ideation. Section 3 regards suicidal behaviour, and indicates if there has been an actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, or preparatory acts/behaviour since the last visit. Additionally, there is a section to indicate if there was suicidal behaviour during the assessment or if there was a suicide since the last visit. Section 4 specifies information about actual attempts only (actual lethality/medical damage and potential lethality).
Change from baseline in Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) scale scores for measuring ED impairment Week 1, Week 5, Post (End of week 8) A 16-item self-report measure of the severity of psychosocial impairment due to eating disorder features over the past 28 days. Each item is ranked on a 0-3 scale (0 being "not at all" and 3 being "a lot").
Qualitative Patient Experience Interview Week 5, Week 9 (1-week Follow-up) An exploratory interview which aims to collect qualitative information on each patient's experiences with the study medication (i.e., from the patient's perspective, how does the medication affect their eating disorder symptoms?).
Change from baseline in the number of purging episodes per week Up to 9 weeks Subjects will record the number of self-induced vomiting episodes in a diary which will be validated weekly by a clinician using structured questions from the Eating Disorder Examination Interview inquiring about symptom frequency since the previous study visit.
Change from baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale modified for binge eating (Y-BOCS-BE) Week 1, Week 5, Post (End of week 8) A 10-item, clinician-administered rating scale for measuring the severity of OCD symptoms as they relate to binge eating. A higher score indicates increased severity. An obsessional subtotal can be calculated by adding items 1-5. A compulsion subtotal can be calculated by adding items 6-10. A total score can be calculated by adding all items. This version will be further modified to assess both binge eating and purging behaviours.
Change from baseline in the three subscale scores of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) Week 1, Week 5, Post (End of week 8) A 51-item self-report scale that assesses three areas of eating behaviours: Cognitive restraint of eating, disinhibition, and hunger.
Change from baseline in weight/body mass index Up to 9 weeks Subjects will be weighed using a calibrated hospital scale while wearing a hospital gown and no footwear.
Change from baseline in systolic/diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) Up to 9 weeks Systolic and diastolic blood pressure will be collected by a study investigator at weekly/biweekly visits.
Change from baseline in the number of binge eating and purging days per week Up to 9 weeks Binge eating and purging days are defined as having one or more episodes of binge eating or purging in a day, respectively.
Change from baseline in the Eating Disorder Examination Interview scores Week 1, Post (End of week 8) A clinician-administered scale that assesses the severity of 4 areas of eating disorder psychopathology over the past 4 weeks (28 days): Eating Concern, Weight Concern, Dietary Restraint, and Shape Concern. Overall eating disorder severity is also assessed. A higher score indicates increased severity. To obtain a particular subscale score, the ratings for the relevant items are added together and the sum divided by the total number of items forming the subscale (i.e., the mean of all subscale items). To obtain a global score, the four subscales scores are summed and the resulting total divided by the number of subscales (i.e., the mean of all items). The scale consists of 28 items.
Change from baseline in the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale scores Week 1, Week 5, Post (End of week 8) This 30-item measure assesses the personality/behavioural construct of impulsiveness and is widely accepted as the primary self-report measure of impulsivity. Items are ranked on a 1-4 scale (1 being "rarely/never" and 4 being "almost always/always"). A total score can be calculated using all 30 items. A higher score indicates higher levels of impulsivity.
Change in the Modified Two-Step Task parameters Week 1, Week 2, Week 5, Week 9 (1-week Follow-up) As measured by the Modified Two-Step Task. This task examines exploration/exploitation (choice consistency), as well as goal-directed (i.e., model-based) and habitual (i.e., model-free) control.
Change from baseline in Motivation, Confidence, and Readiness for Behaviour Change Questions Week 1, Week 5, Post (End of week 8) A 3-item measure that assesses the perceived value of changing binge eating, confidence in ability to change binge eating, and readiness to change binge eating.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Nova Scotia Health Authority
🇨🇦Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada