Comparison of two surgical methods Dynamic Compression Plate and Intramedullary Nail of tibial shaft

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Fracture of shaft of tibia; Fracture of shaft of tibi.; S82.2

• Registration Number: IRCT20221029056333N2
• Lead Sponsor: Babol University of Medical Sciences

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 7 February 2023

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Complete
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 60

Inclusion Criteria

Having the age of 15 to 65 years
Fracture formation following acute trauma
The presence of a fracture in the diaphysis of the tibia

Exclusion Criteria

History of tibial bone fracture in two lower limbs
Previous failure
Open fracture
History of underlying bone disease
History of tibial bone fracture in two lower limbs
Peroneal nerve damage
Associated with proximal or distal fracture

Study & Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Knee pain after rod insertion. Timepoint: 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks and 12 weeks and two months after surgery. Method of measurement: Using the VAS scale & record severe pain intensity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Millionaire. Timepoint: 12 weeks to 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Based on examination and radiography.;Not welding. Timepoint: 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Based on examination and radiography.;Delay in welding. Timepoint: 3-6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Based on examination and radiography.;Infection after surgery. Timepoint: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and two months after surgery. Method of measurement: Based on the findings of the examination, including warmth, swelling, erythema, pus discharge, and radiography.