MedPath

Comparison of Two Ventilation Methods for Micro-Laryngeal Surgery

Not Applicable
Conditions
Laryngeal Disease
Interventions
Device: Flow Controlled Ventilation using a laryngeal tri-tube
Device: High-flow nasal oxygen therapy using a specific nasal cannula
Registration Number
NCT04369040
Lead Sponsor
Hopital Foch
Brief Summary

Single-center, randomized study, comparing two methods of oxygenation on 80 patients

Detailed Description

This study is a single-center, randomized study, comparing two methods of oxygenation during micro-laryngeal surgery performed under general anesthesia and myorelaxation: high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) or Flow Controlled Ventilation (FCV) using a laryngeal tri-tube. The study population will be composed of 80 patients, aged over 18 and under 80.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient over the age of 18 and under the age of 80
  • Patient to benefit from micro-laryngeal ENT surgery under general anesthesia and myorelaxation with an estimated duration which does not exceed 30 minutes
  • Having signed a consent form
  • Being affiliated with a Health Insurance plan.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnant or lactating patient
  • Patient with a weight <40 kg
  • Obese patient (BMI> 30)
  • Patient with foreseeable intubation difficulty
  • Patient maintained under general anesthesia postoperatively
  • Surgery requiring time by surgical laser
  • Surgery involving the use of an active electrosurgical electrode in the immediate area of the electrosurgical device or electrode
  • Predictable surgery longer than 30 minutes
  • Being deprived of liberty or under guardianship.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Flow Controlled VentilationFlow Controlled Ventilation using a laryngeal tri-tubeVentilation with laryngeal tri-tube with Flow Controlled Ventilation technique
High-flow nasal oxygen therapyHigh-flow nasal oxygen therapy using a specific nasal cannulaVentilation with High-flow nasal oxygen therapy
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Compare the percentage of patients having oxygen desaturation during the procedure or a PaCO2 > 65 mmHg at its end with both methods (high-flow nasal oxygen therapy and the use of FCV modality via a laryngeal tri-tube).1 day (during surgery)

% of patients having an oxygen desaturation (SpO2\<92%) during the procedure OR a PaCO2 \> 65 mmHg at its end

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Evaluate the incidence of atelectasis1 day (during surgery)

Incidence of atelectasis on a postoperative chest X ray

Evaluate the duration of oxygen therapy before desaturation in the two groups1 day (during surgery)

Delay before oxygen desaturation (SpO2\<92%) during the procedure

Evaluate the incidence of postoperative complications on day 1 in relation to the technique1 day

Incidence of postoperative complications at day 1 after the surgery

Evaluate the quality of the visualization of the laryngeal region in the two groups1 day (during surgery)

Percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score at laryngoscopy

Evaluate the time-PaCO2 (partial pressure of carbon dioxide) relationship according to the techniques1 day (during surgery)

PaCO2 (partial pressure of carbon dioxide) at the end of the procedure

Evaluate the time taken to resume spontaneous ventilation and wake up when the anesthetic agents are stopped1 day (during surgery)

Delay between the end of administration of anesthetic drugs and return to spontaneous ventilation

Evaluate the possibility of a decrease in FiO2 (Fraction of inspired oxygen)1 day (during surgery)

Minimal inspired fraction of oxygen during the procedure

Evaluate the incidence of postoperative complications on day 7 in relation to the technique7 days

Incidence of postoperative complications up to day 7

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hopital Foch

🇫🇷

Suresnes, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath