跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01876173
NCT01876173已完成不适用

Development of and Feasibility Testing of Decision Support for Patients Who Are Candidates for an Implantable Defibrillator

McMaster University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 82 人开始时间: 2012年6月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
82
试验地点
1
主要终点
Primary Outcomes(composite): i) decision aid development, and ii) decision aid evaluation.

研究概览

简要总结

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to a ventricular arrhythmia is a serious cause of cardiovascular death in Canada. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) offers high-risk patients a treatment option to reduce the incidence of SCD by delivering an internal shock to restore a normal rhythm, if needed. Definitive evidence has established the effectiveness of the ICD for reducing mortality when used as prophylaxis for SCD (a primary prevention indication). Approximately 3,700 new candidates accrue annually. Practice guidelines define the criteria to determine patient ICD candidacy for primary prevention. However, in addition to SCD risk, ICD candidates may have chronic diseases such as diabetes, renal insufficiency, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. Thus, balancing the benefits and risks of an ICD can become complex, particularly when competing mortality risks are present. Research has recognized human costs associated with device complications and shocks affecting psychological, health related quality of life (HRQL), and morbidity outcomes. The complexities surrounding the long-term benefits/risks, complications, replacements, and shocks, warrant decision support to prepare patients to make decisions. In Canada, there is no clear framework to support patients' decision-making in the context of ICD treatment options. Decision support, using a decision aid, could moderate treatment related uncertainty and prepare patients to make active, informed, quality decisions.

Objectives: 1) develop a decision aid for ICD candidates to support quality decision-making (informed, deliberate, values-based choices), 2) to evaluate the decision aid, and 3) to determine the feasibility of conducting a trial.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Referred for consideration of an ICD(non-CRT)for a primary prevention indication
  • •English speaking
  • •able to provide informed consent

排除标准

  • •unable to understand the decision aid due to a language barrier or visual impairment
  • •referred for secondary prevention indication

研究组 & 干预措施

Patient Decision Aid for an ICD (primary prevention, non-CRT)

Experimental

The intervention group will receive the PtDA, which provides a lay summary that outlines the facts, risks, benefits (including probabilities), specific to the option of an implantable defibrillator or the option of medical management to prepare them for consultation with the physician. Values are assessed to reveal which features of each option are important to patients.

干预措施: Patient Decision Aid for an ICD (primary prevention, non-CRT) (Behavioral)

Usual care

No Intervention

The control group will not receive the patient decision aid prior to consultation with the physician.

结局指标

主要结局

Primary Outcomes(composite): i) decision aid development, and ii) decision aid evaluation.

时间窗: Phase 1-2 (1- year)

Development of the decision aid will be guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF). Evaluation will include the Decision Aid Acceptability questionnaire comprised of 10 items including comprehensibility, balance of presentation of information, and overall suitability.

次要结局

  • Pilot RCT (feasibility)(Pre-Post consultation - participants will be followed until consultation is completed and at 3 months post consultation (average of 16 weeks))
  • Decision quality measures(Pre consultation (baseline visit))
  • Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)(Pre and post consultation- (intervention and usual care group, baseline visit + 1 week post consult))
  • Sure Test(Pre-consultation - baseline visit)
  • The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)(Pre consultation - baseline visit (intervention and usual care))
  • Preparation for Decision Making scale(Post consultation - up to two weeks post baseline visit (intervention group))
  • The Medical Outcomes Trust Short Form (SF-36v2)(Pre consultation - baseline visit (intervention and usual care))

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Sandra Carroll

Assistant Professor

McMaster University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验