Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05961436
NCT05961436
Completed
Not Applicable

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block: Impact on Quadriceps Muscle Strength in Patients With Hip Fracture - a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Beni-Suef University1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentSeptember 1, 2023
ConditionsPain

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Pain
Sponsor
Beni-Suef University
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Quadriceps muscle strength in recovery.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this work is to compare between the use of PENG block and femoral nerve block for perioperative pain management in patients with hip fracture.

Detailed Description

Hip fractures are common orthopaedic problem especially in elderly population which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Early surgical reduction and fixation is the preferred treatment in most patients. Significant pain, if inadequately controlled, can impair early rehabilitation and functional recovery and can reduce patient satisfaction after surgery . Combinations of systemic analgesics, intra-articular injection, and neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks should be considered as the integral components of the perioperative pain management plan. Among these, intra-articular local anaesthetic injections have been shown to play a potential role in providing analgesia after hip arthroplasty. The risks of this procedure include hematoma, nerve damage, local anaesthetics toxicity, intravenous injection of local anesthetics and septic osteoarthritis, but their occurrence is very rare. Several peripheral nerve blocks, including fascia iliaca block, femoral block (FB), and some interfascial plane blocks such as quadratus lumborum block (QLB), have also been suggested to decrease postoperative pain and opioid use. Lumbar plexus block/psoas compartment block is a technically difficult deep block that requires greater skill and hence can be time consuming. The lumbar paravertebral region is highly vascular and non-compressible. Hence, patients on anti-coagulation are at high risk for bleeding complications. There is also high risk of unintentional neuraxial block or inadvertent intravascular injection with local anaesthetic systemic toxicity. Some nerve branches responsible for hip joint innervation may not be blocked by QLB, which should be taken into consideration while using these blocks for hip fracture. High-volume suprainguinal fascia iliaca block and traditional fascia iliaca block have also been reported to be associated with a significant incidence of muscle weakness and to predispose the patient to fall. The anterior hip capsule is innervated by the obturator nerve (ON), accessory obturator nerve (AON), and femoral nerve (FN) as reported by previous anatomic studies. The anterior capsule is the most richly innervated section of the joint, suggesting these nerves should be the main targets for hip analgesia. Femoral block (FB) does not block the AON or the articular branches of the ON. Also, femoral nerve block accompanied by decreasing the strength of quadriceps muscles. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block was described in 2018 and reported that it was successfully used for postoperative pain management in hip surgery. The PENG block is a technique that involves deposition of local anaesthetic in the musculofascial plane between the psoas muscle and the superior pubic ramus for the blockade of the articular branches of the FN, ON and AON that provide sensory innervation to the anterior hip capsule.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 1, 2023
End Date
November 1, 2024
Last Updated
5 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dina Mahmoud Fakhry

Lecturer of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Management

Beni-Suef University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with a hip fracture.
  • Aged 50 years and older.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Consent refusal.
  • Allergy to local anaesthetics.
  • Infection of the puncture site.
  • Dementia or cognitive impairment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Quadriceps muscle strength in recovery.

Time Frame: 24 hours of the procedure

Quadriceps muscle strength will be assessed using Oxford muscle strength grading with grouped scores of intact (5/5), reduced (1-4/5) and absent (0/5). Muscle Grading Scores: 0 No detectable muscle contraction (visible or palpation) 1. Detectable contraction (visible or palpation), but no movement achieved 2. Limb movement achieved, but unable to move against gravity 3. Limb movement against resistance of gravity 4. Limb movement against gravity and external resistance 5. Normal strength

Secondary Outcomes

  • Visual analogue scale(24 hours of the procedure.)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials