Impact of Extensive Consultation on Career Development Grant Outcomes
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 132
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- NIH priority score of the reviewed proposal, with unsubmitted or unscored proposals counted as priority scores that are right-censored at 300 (old system) or 50 (new system)
研究概览
简要总结
In this study we wish is to determine whether extensive (up to 15 hours) multidisciplinary consultation in biostatistics, study design, data management, ethics, and writing provided by the UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute's (CTSI) Consultation Services program, improves peer review scores of career development grants compared to usual levels of consultation.
We hypothesize that extensive multidisciplinary consultation will improve peer review scores of career development grants compared to usual levels of consultation.
We hypothesize that extensive multidisciplinary consultation will lead to greater numbers of funded grants when compared to the usual levels of consultation.
详细描述
CTSI Consultation Services is one of the largest programs within the UCSF CTSI. It was created to improve the quality and efficiency of clinical and translational research through the provision of expert consultation. The program is divided into units that provide access to expert consultants in biostatistics, research design (with consultants representing multiple distinct methodologies and disease interests), data management (including data structure and database design), ethics, and scientific writing. With funding from the NIH, the program is able to offer a free hour of consultation in each of its units (up to 4 hours) but charges for additional services to cover costs.
There have been no studies of research consultation services. Though the benefit may seem self evident, such programs are expensive and distract senior researcher from more creative work. Justifying research consultation is important given the multitude of activities vying for attention and funding. Observational studies of the impact of research consultation services will always be limited by confounding, particularly confounding by indication since those seeking such services may be more highly motivated and organized. Thus, a randomized trial is warranted.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Applying for a Career Development grant from the NIH.
- •Anticipated submission date is 3 or more months in the future
- •Resident, fellow, or junior faculty member at UCSF or a CTSI-affiliated institution.
- •Recognized potential benefit from additional consultation
- •Additional areas that could be improved as judged by the subject and the initial consultant
- •Adequate time to provide consultation before submission date
排除标准
- 未提供
研究组 & 干预措施
1-Extensive Consultations
Intervention- Receives extensive consulting services
干预措施: Extensive Consultations (Other)
2-Regular levels of service
Control - Receives regular levels of service; one hour free services from each of the 4 units, with option to pay for more.
结局指标
主要结局
NIH priority score of the reviewed proposal, with unsubmitted or unscored proposals counted as priority scores that are right-censored at 300 (old system) or 50 (new system)
时间窗: 30 Months
次要结局
- Percentage of subjects who submit proposals for funding(30 Months)
- Percentage of subjects who obtain funding for the submitted proposal(30 Months)
- Institute-specific percentile of the priority score(30 Months)
- Percentage of subjects who received a good score (<40 or <200) which may be associated with future funding of a resubmission(30 Months)
- Percentage of subjects who obtained any career development award funding(30 Months)