Comparison between 2 different techniques of performing deviated nasal septum correction surgery

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Health Condition 1: J342- Deviated nasal septum

• Registration Number: CTRI/2020/01/022725
• Lead Sponsor: Ishan Sardesai

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 17 October 2022

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Closed to Recruitment of Participants
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: 0

Inclusion Criteria

Patients with symptomatic deviated nasal septum, anterior as well as posterior deviation of septum, with no radiographic evidence of sinusitis, with associated allergic rhinitis adequately controlled by medical management, with associated turbinate hypertrophy

Exclusion Criteria

Patients below 18 years of age, patients with mild asymptomatic deviated nasal septum, with sinus disease involving 2 or more paranasal sinuses, with radiographic evidence of sinusitis, with caudal dislocation of septum, undergoing revision surgery, with vasomotor rhinitis and nasal polyps, with allergic rhinitis not adequately controlled by medical management, those undergoing septorhinoplasty

Study & Design

• Study Type: Observational
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Improvement of nasal symptoms following septoturbinoplasty based on subjective NOSE questionnaire data collected pre and post operatively and data collected through diagnostic nasal endoscopy, pre and post operatively, analysed using Lund-Kennedy scoring system.Timepoint: Follow up period of each study subject will be 1 and 3 months (as per standard of care).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
% of intraoperative and postoperative complications in endoscopic versus conventional septoturbinoplasty groupsTimepoint: Follow up period of each study subject will be 1 and 3 months (as per standard of care)