Effectiveness Of Passive Stretching Versus Muscle Energy Technique On Pain, Rom And Function In Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis -a Comparative Study
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: M750- Adhesive capsulitis of shoulder
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/01/061953
- Lead Sponsor
- Maharashtra Institute Of Physiotherapy , Latur
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
age group 30-60
willing to participate
male and females
participants with unilateral Adhesive Capsulitis having restriction in passive movements
patients with controlled diabetic
with stage III includes
Exclusion Criteria
1.History of shoulder surgery 2.Fracture 3.Dislocation 4.Recent trauma 5.Having radiculopathy of upper limb 6.Neurological disorders of upper limb
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie adhesive capsulitis improvement with muscle energy techniques?
How does passive stretching compare to muscle energy techniques in standard shoulder rehabilitation protocols?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict better outcomes for passive stretching or muscle energy techniques in adhesive capsulitis?
What adverse events are associated with muscle energy techniques versus passive stretching in shoulder therapy?
What combination therapies show enhanced efficacy for adhesive capsulitis compared to standalone passive stretching or muscle energy techniques?