External oblique intercostal plane block versus Erector spinae plane block for post operative analgesia in open hepatopancreatic biliary surgeries- a randomized control trial
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 60
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- To compare the postoperative fentanyl
Overview
Brief Summary
Hypothesis; external oblique intercostal plane block is as effective as erector spinae plane block in providing analgesia in patients undergoing open hepatopancreatic biliary surgeries
Study population - 60 patients undergoing open hepatopancreatic biliary surgeries
Group A- 30 patients- USG guided External oblique intercostal plane block.
Group B- 30 patients- USG guided Erector spinae plane block.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18.00 Year(s) to 65.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age 18-60 years , undergoing open hepatopancreatic and biliary surgery, who give consent.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patient refusal Infection at site of administration Allergy to local anaesthetics Insufficient comprehension of the use of Patient controlled Analgesia ( PCA) machine Coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia (Platelet count less than 80,000/ microL ).
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
To compare the postoperative fentanyl
Time Frame: upto 24 hours in the post operative period
consumption at 24 hours between the external oblique intercostal plane block and Erector spinae plane block groups
Time Frame: upto 24 hours in the post operative period
Secondary Outcomes
- To compare the intraoperative IV fentanyl requirements in both the groups.(To compare the postoperative pain using NRS in both the groups)
Investigators
Dr Kiran Premraj
Institute of Liver and Biliary sciences