MedPath

Guselkumab in Active Psoriatic Arthritis Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to One Prior Anti-TNF Alpha Agent

Phase 3
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Arthritis, Psoriatic
Interventions
Drug: Placebo
Registration Number
NCT04936308
Lead Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab treatment in participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inadequate response (IR) and/or intolerance to a prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) by assessing the reduction in signs and symptoms of PsA.

Detailed Description

PsA is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by peripheral joint inflammation, enthesitis, dactylitis, axial disease, and the skin lesions associated with psoriasis. Guselkumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds to p19 protein subunit of interleukin (IL)-23 and blocks the binding of extracellular IL-23 to the cell surface IL-23 receptor, inhibiting IL-23 specific intracellular signaling, subsequent activation, and cytokine production. The primary hypothesis of this study is that guselkumab is superior to placebo as assessed by the proportion of participants who had an inadequate response (IR) and/or intolerance to one prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR 20) response at Week 24. This study will consist of a screening phase (up to 6 weeks), blinded treatment phase (approximately up to 2 years), which includes a placebo-controlled period from Week 0 to Week 24, and an active-controlled treatment phase from Week 24 to Week 100, and safety follow-up phase (Week 112). Safety assessments will include physical examinations, vital signs, height, weight, electrocardiograms, and clinical safety laboratory assessments. The total duration of the study will be up to 118 weeks.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
453
Inclusion Criteria
  • Have a diagnosis of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study agent and meet Classification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) at screening
  • Have active PsA as defined by: at least 3 swollen joints and at least 3 tender joints at screening and at baseline; and C-reactive protein (CRP) greater than or equal to (>=) 0.3 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) at screening from the central laboratory
  • Have at least one of the following PsA subsets: distal interphalangeal joint involvement, polyarticular arthritis with absence of rheumatoid nodules, asymmetric peripheral arthritis, or spondylitis with peripheral arthritis
  • Have active plaque psoriasis, with at least one psoriatic plaque of >= 2 centimeters (cm) diameter and/or nail changes consistent with psoriasis, or documented history of plaque psoriasis
  • Have an inadequate response and/or intolerance to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) therapy, defined as presence of active PsA despite previous treatment with one prior anti-TNF alpha agent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Has other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit of guselkumab therapy in the treatment of PsA, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis/nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
  • Has received more than 1 prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha agent (or biosimilars)
  • Has ever received Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor including but not limited to tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, peficitinib, decernotinib, upadacitinib or any other investigational JAK inhibitor
  • Has received any systemic immunosuppressants (example, azathioprine, cyclosporine, 6 thioguanine, mercaptopurine, mycophenolate mofetil, hydroxyurea, tacrolimus) within 4 weeks of the first administration of study intervention
  • Has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to guselkumab or its excipients
  • Has a history of chronic or recurrent infectious disease, including but not limited to chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection (example, bronchiectasis), recurrent urinary tract infection (example, recurrent pyelonephritis or chronic non-remitting cystitis), fungal infection (example, mucocutaneous candidiasis), or open, draining, or infected skin wounds or ulcers

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group 1: Guselkumab and PlaceboPlaceboParticipants will receive guselkumab and placebo subcutaneously (SC) to maintain the blind.
Group 2: GuselkumabGuselkumabParticipants will receive guselkumab SC.
Group 3: Placebo Followed by GuselkumabPlaceboParticipants will receive placebo SC and will cross over to receive guselkumab SC.
Group 1: Guselkumab and PlaceboGuselkumabParticipants will receive guselkumab and placebo subcutaneously (SC) to maintain the blind.
Group 3: Placebo Followed by GuselkumabGuselkumabParticipants will receive placebo SC and will cross over to receive guselkumab SC.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24Week 24

The ACR 20 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and \>=20 percent (%) improvement from baseline in 3 of following 5 assessments: participant's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-100 millimeter \[mm\], 0 mm=no pain and 100 mm=worst possible pain), participant's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, \[0 mm= very well to 100 mm= very poor\]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 100), \[0 = no arthritis to 100 = extremely active arthritis\], participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas. The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and CRP.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants With Anti-guselkumab AntibodiesUp to 112 weeks

Percentage of participants with anti-guselkumab antibodies to guselkumab will be reported.

Percentage of Participants who Achieve a Psoriasis Response of IGA Psoriasis Score of 0 or 1 and >=2 Grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 24 Among Participants With >=3% Body Surface Area (BSA) Psoriatic Involvement and IGA Score of >=2 at BaselineWeek 24

Psoriasis response is defined as an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) psoriasis score of 0 (cleared) or 1 (minimal) and \>=2- grade reduction from baseline. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis and lesions are graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5-point scale: 0 (no evidence), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). The IGA score of psoriasis is based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 24Baseline and Week 24

The FACIT-F is a questionnaire that assesses self-reported tiredness, weakness, and difficulty conducting usual activities due to fatigue. The subscale consists 13-item instrument to measure fatigue. Each of the 13 items has a set of five response categories: Not at all (=0), A little bit (=1), Somewhat (=2), Quite a bit (=3) and Very much (=4). A total FACIT-Fatigue subscale score is calculated as the sum of the 13 item scores (reserved scores \[4 - score\]) and ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating less fatigue. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement of fatigue. Items are reverse scored when appropriate to provide a scale in which higher scores represent better functioning or less fatigue.

Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week 24Baseline and Week 24

HAQ-DI score assess functional status of participant. It is 20 question instrument that assess degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0=indicating no difficulty, to 3=indicating inability to perform a task in that area. Total HAQ score is average of the computed categories scores ranging from 0-3 where 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. Lower scores are indicative of better functioning. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement of physical function.

Percentage of Participants who Achieve ACR 70 Response at Week 24Week 24

ACR 70 response is defined as \>= 70% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and \>=70% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI; a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0=no difficulty, 3=inability to perform a task in that area), and CRP.

Percentage of Participants who Achieve ACR 20 Response at Week 16Week 16

ACR 20 response: \>=20% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and \>=20% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Disability Index of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI; 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0=indicating no difficulty, 3=indicating inability to perform task in that area), and CRP.

Percentage of Participants With InfectionsUp to 112 weeks

Percentage of participants with infections will be reported.

Percentage of Participants With Injection-site ReactionsUp to 100 weeks

Percentage of participants with injection-site reactions will be reported. An injection-site reaction is any adverse reaction at a subcutaneous (SC) study intervention injection-site.

Percentage of participants With Laboratory Abnormalities With Maximum Toxicity Grades as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ToxicityUp to 112 weeks

Percentage of participants with laboratory abnormalities (hematology, chemistry) with maximum toxicity grades as per CTCAE will be reported. Grade refers to the severity of the AE as follows: Grade 1- Mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2- Moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Grade 3- Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4- Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5- Death related to AE.

Percentage of Participants who Achieve ACR 50 Response at Week 16Week 16

ACR 50 response is defined as \>=50% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and \>=50% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI; a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0=no difficulty, 3=inability to perform a task in that area), and CRP.

Percentage of Participants With Change from Baseline in Clinical Laboratory AbnormalitiesUp to 112 weeks

Percentage of participants with change from baseline in clinical laboratory abnormalities including chemistry and hematology will be reported.

Percentage of Participants who Achieve PASI 90 Response at Week 24 Among the Participants With >=3% BSA Psoriatic Involvement and an IGA Score of >=2 (Mild) at BaselineWeek 24

Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is a tool to assess and grade severity of psoriasis and response to therapy. In PASI, body is divided into 4 areas: head, trunk, upper extremities, lower extremities. Each area is assessed separately for percentage of area involved and translated to numeric score ranging from 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90 to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, each rated on scale of 0 to 4 that is none to maximum severity. PASI numeric score range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. A PASI 90 response: \>=90% improvement in PASI score from baseline.

Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 24Baseline and Week 24

SF-36 is a multi-domain instrument with 36 items to evaluate the health status and quality of life. It included 8 subscales (physical functioning, physical role functioning, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, emotional role functioning, and mental health), which yielded a PCS with score range 0-100 (higher score-better quality of life) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) with score range 0-100 (higher score-better quality of life) in addition to subscale scores. The PCS scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviations of 10, based upon general US population norms. A positive change indicates improvement while a negative change indicates worsening of health status and quality of life.

Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 24Week 24

MDA is considered achieved if at least 5 of the following 7 criteria were met at the analysis visit: tender joint count \<=1; swollen joint count \<=1; psoriasis activity and severity index \<=1; patient's pain VAS score of \<=15; patient's global disease activity VAS (arthritis and psoriasis) score of \<=20; HAQ-DI \<=0.5; and tender entheseal points \<=1.

Serum Guselkumab ConcentrationUp to 112 weeks

Serum guselkumab concentration will be measured.

Percentage of Participants who Achieve ACR 50 Response at Week 24Week 24

ACR 50 response is defined as \>=50 percent (%) improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints), and \>=50% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (arthritis, VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100 mm, 0=no arthritis activity and 100=extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI; a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas; range: 0-3, 0=no difficulty, 3=inability to perform a task in that area), and CRP.

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Reasonably Related AEs, as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityUp to 112 weeks

Percentage of participants with AEs, SAEs reasonably related AEs will be assessed. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, and suspects transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product. Reasonably related AEs are those AEs which are judged related to study treatment by the investigator.

Percentage of Participants With AEs leading to Discontinuation of Study InterventionUp to 112 weeks

Percentage of participants with AEs leading to discontinuation of study intervention will be reported.

Trial Locations

Locations (163)

DJL Clinical Research, PLLC

🇺🇸

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Arthritis and Rheumatology Center of MI

🇺🇸

Okemos, Michigan, United States

Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC

🇺🇸

Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, United States

St. Paul Rheumatology P A

🇺🇸

Eagan, Minnesota, United States

Arthritis Consultants

🇺🇸

Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

Arthritis Rheumatic And Back Disease Associates

🇺🇸

Voorhees, New Jersey, United States

Albuquerque Center for Rheumatology

🇺🇸

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Arthritis and Osteoperosis Associates of New Mexico

🇺🇸

Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States

Buffalo Rheumatology and Medicine PLLC

🇺🇸

Orchard Park, New York, United States

STAT Research, Inc.

🇺🇸

Vandalia, Ohio, United States

Military Medical Academy

🇧🇬

Sofia, Bulgaria

UMHAT St. Ivan Rilski

🇧🇬

Sofia, Bulgaria

ASIMP Rheumatology Centre St Irina EOOD

🇧🇬

Sofia, Bulgaria

University Multiprofile Hospital Sofiamed Sofia

🇧🇬

Sofia, Bulgaria

Medical Centre Synexus

🇧🇬

Sofia, Bulgaria

RHEUMA s r o

🇨🇿

Breclav, Czechia

L K N Arthrocentrum

🇨🇿

Hlucin, Czechia

MUDr Rosypalova s r o

🇨🇿

Ostrava, Czechia

Arthrohelp S.R.O.

🇨🇿

Pardubice, Czechia

Revmatologicky ustav

🇨🇿

Praha 2, Czechia

Medical Plus S R O

🇨🇿

Uherske Hradiste, Czechia

PV Medical S R O

🇨🇿

Zlin, Czechia

Betegapolo Irgalmas Rend Budai Irgalmasrendi Korhaz

🇭🇺

Budapest, Hungary

Uno Medical Trials Ltd.

🇭🇺

Budapest, Hungary

Debreceni Egyetem, Kenézy Gyula Egyetemi Oktatókórház

🇭🇺

Debrecen, Hungary

Bekes Megyei Kozponti Korhaz Pandy Kalman Tagkorhaz

🇭🇺

Gyula, Hungary

Pest Megyei Flor Ferenc Korhaz

🇭🇺

Kistarcsa, Hungary

Szegedi Tudományegyetem, ÁOK, Szent-Györgyi Albert Klinikai Központ

🇭🇺

Szeged, Hungary

Fejer Varmegyei Szent Gyorgy Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz

🇭🇺

Szekesfehervar, Hungary

Vital Medical Center Orvosi es Fogaszati Kozpont

🇭🇺

Veszprem, Hungary

Bnai Zion Medical Center

🇮🇱

Haifa, Israel

Rambam Health Care Campus

🇮🇱

Haifa, Israel

Carmel Medical Center

🇮🇱

Hifa, Israel

Meir Medical Center

🇮🇱

Kfar-Sava, Israel

Sheba Medical Center

🇮🇱

Ramat Gan, Israel

Hospital Selayang

🇲🇾

Batu Caves, Malaysia

Hospital Pulau Pinang

🇲🇾

George Town, Malaysia

Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun

🇲🇾

Ipoh, Malaysia

Hospital Tuanku Jaafar

🇲🇾

Seremban, Malaysia

Nzoz Bif Med

🇵🇱

Bytom, Poland

Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze

🇵🇱

Elblag, Poland

Malopolskie Badania Kliniczne Sp z o o

🇵🇱

Krakow, Poland

Malopolskie Centrum Kliniczne

🇵🇱

Krakow, Poland

Centrum Medyczne Promed

🇵🇱

Krakow, Poland

Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o

🇵🇱

Lodz, Poland

Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J M Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo Akcyjna

🇵🇱

Lodz, Poland

NZOZ Lecznica MAK MED S C

🇵🇱

Nadarzyn, Poland

Twoja Przychodnia - Centrum Medyczne Nowa Sol

🇵🇱

Nowa Sol, Poland

Twoja Przychodnia PCM

🇵🇱

Poznan, Poland

Centrum Medyczne

🇵🇱

Poznan, Poland

Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne

🇵🇱

Swidnik, Poland

MICS Centrum Medyczne Warszawa

🇵🇱

Warsaw, Poland

Rheuma Medicus Sp z o o

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Poland

Centrum Medyczne Reuma Park

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Poland

WroMedica I Bielicka A Strzalkowska s c

🇵🇱

Wroclaw, Poland

GCM Medical Group

🇵🇷

San Juan, Puerto Rico

Mindful Medical Research

🇵🇷

San Juan, Puerto Rico

FDI Clinical Research

🇵🇷

San Juan, Puerto Rico

Altay Medical State University

🇷🇺

Barnaul, Russian Federation

Chelyabinck Regional Clinical Hospital

🇷🇺

Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

Akdeniz University Medical Faculty

🇹🇷

Antalya, Turkey

Uludag University Medical Faculty

🇹🇷

Bursa, Turkey

Pamukkale University Medical Faculty

🇹🇷

Denizli, Turkey

Osmangazi University Medical Faculty

🇹🇷

Eskisehir, Turkey

Istanbul University Istanbul Medical Faculty

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

Medical Center of 'Institute of Rheumatology', LLC

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

Kyiv City Clinical Hospital #3

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar sehir Hastanesi

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

Marmara University Medical Faculty

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

Kocaeli University Medical Faculty

🇹🇷

Kocaeli, Turkey

Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty

🇹🇷

Konya, Turkey

Communal Noncommercial Enterprise Cherkasy Regional Hospital of Cherkasy Regional Council

🇺🇦

Cherkasy, Ukraine

Municipal non-commercial enterprise of Kharkiv Regional Council Regional Clinical Hospital

🇺🇦

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Khmelnitckiy regional hospital

🇺🇦

Khmelnytsky, Ukraine

City Clinical Hospital No. 2

🇺🇦

Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine

Medical Center LLC 'Harmony of Beauty'

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

Kyiv Railway Clinical Hospital #2 Of Branch 'Health Center' Of The Company 'Ukrainian Railway'

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

SI National Scientific Center Institute of Cardiology of M.D. Strazhesko of NAMS of Ukraine

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

Medical Center 'Consylium Medical'

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

Volyn Regional Clinical Hospital

🇺🇦

Lutsk, Ukraine

LLC Medical House

🇺🇦

Odessa, Ukraine

ME Poltava Regional Clinical Hospital named after M.V. Sklifosovsky of Poltava Regional Consuil

🇺🇦

Poltava, Ukraine

Vinnitsia Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. M. I. Pyrogov

🇺🇦

Vinnytsya, Ukraine

Medical Center LLC 'Modern Clinic'

🇺🇦

Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine

Great Lakes Center of Rheumatology

🇺🇸

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Arthritis Associates

🇺🇸

Mountain Brook, Alabama, United States

Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Research PLLC

🇺🇸

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Associates

🇺🇸

Sun City, Arizona, United States

Southern Arizona VA Healthcare System

🇺🇸

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Unity Health-White County Medical Center

🇺🇸

Searcy, Arkansas, United States

Newport Huntington Medical Group

🇺🇸

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Medvin Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Tujunga, California, United States

Clinical Research Center of Connecticut

🇺🇸

Danbury, Connecticut, United States

Bay Pines VA Healthcare System

🇺🇸

Bay Pines, Florida, United States

Clinical Research of West Florida

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

Omega Research Consultants

🇺🇸

DeBary, Florida, United States

Advanced Clinical Research of Orlando

🇺🇸

Ocoee, Florida, United States

Integral Rheumatology And Immunology Specialists

🇺🇸

Plantation, Florida, United States

Florida Medical Clinic, P.A.

🇺🇸

Zephyrhills, Florida, United States

Great Lakes Clinical Trials

🇺🇸

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Clinic of Robert Hozman

🇺🇸

Skokie, Illinois, United States

The Arthritis and Diabetes Clinic

🇺🇸

Monroe, Louisiana, United States

Johns Hopkins University

🇺🇸

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Klein And Associates M D P A

🇺🇸

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Health Research of Oklahoma

🇺🇸

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Rheumatology Associates of Oklahoma

🇺🇸

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Dr. Ramesh Gupta

🇺🇸

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Precision Comprehensive Clinical Research Solutions

🇺🇸

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Adriana Pop Moody MD Clinic PA

🇺🇸

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Metroplex Clinical Research Center

🇺🇸

Dallas, Texas, United States

West Texas Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Southwest Rheumatology Research LLC

🇺🇸

Mesquite, Texas, United States

Texas Rheumatology Care

🇺🇸

Plano, Texas, United States

Advanced Rheumatology of Houston

🇺🇸

The Woodlands, Texas, United States

DM Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Tomball, Texas, United States

Arthritis And Osteoporosis Clinic

🇺🇸

Waco, Texas, United States

Arthritis Northwest PLLC

🇺🇸

Spokane, Washington, United States

Rheumatology and Pulmonary Clinic

🇺🇸

Beckley, West Virginia, United States

Cosultorios Reumatologógicos Pampa

🇦🇷

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Centro Privado de Medicina Familiar

🇦🇷

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Hospital Central Militar Cirujano Mayor Dr Cosme Argerich

🇦🇷

Buenos Aires, Argentina

CIPREC

🇦🇷

Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

OMI

🇦🇷

Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Instituto de Reumatología Mendoza

🇦🇷

Ciudad de Mendoza, Argentina

Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Tucuman

🇦🇷

San Miguel De Tucuman, Argentina

Southern Clinical Research

🇦🇺

Hobart, Australia

Liverpool Hospital

🇦🇺

Liverpool, Australia

Skin Health Institute Inc.

🇦🇺

Melbourne, Australia

Eastern Health - Box Hill Hospital

🇦🇺

Melbourne, Australia

UMHAT 'Dr. Georgi Stranski', EAD

🇧🇬

Pleven, Bulgaria

Medical Center Unimed Plovdiv

🇧🇬

Plovdiv, Bulgaria

UMHAT Kaspela

🇧🇬

Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Diagnosis-consulting centre-1

🇧🇬

Ruse, Bulgaria

Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary

🇷🇺

Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

Kemerovo State Medical University

🇷🇺

Kemerovo, Russian Federation

LLL Medical Center Revma-Med

🇷🇺

Kemerovo, Russian Federation

LLC Family Outpatient Clinic # 4

🇷🇺

Korolev, Russian Federation

Krasnodar Clinical Dermatovenerologic Dispensary

🇷🇺

Krasnodar, Russian Federation

Regional SBI of PH Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical hospital #20 named after I.S. Berzon

🇷🇺

Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation

Clinical-Diagnostic Center Euromedservice, JSC

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

FGBU Research Institute of Rheumatology named V.A.Nasonova

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

GBUZ of Moscow Region 'Moscow Region SRI n.a. Vladimirskyi'

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

GBOU VPO Orenburg State Medical University

🇷🇺

Orenburg, Russian Federation

Rostov Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary

🇷🇺

Rostov, Russian Federation

Saratov Regional Clinical Hospital

🇷🇺

Saratov, Russian Federation

Smolensk regional hospital on Smolensk railway station

🇷🇺

Smolensk, Russian Federation

St. Petersburg GBUZ Clinical Reumatological Hospital 25

🇷🇺

St. Petersburg, Russian Federation

X7 Clinical Research Company Limited

🇷🇺

St. Petersburg, Russian Federation

GBUZ of Samara Region 'Tolyatti City Clinical Hospital 5'

🇷🇺

Tolyatti, Russian Federation

Tula Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary

🇷🇺

Tula, Russian Federation

Republican Clinical Hospital - G.G. Kuvatov

🇷🇺

Ufa, Russian Federation

Hosp. Univ. de Cruces

🇪🇸

Barakaldo, Spain

Hosp. Univ. de La Princesa

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Hosp. Quiron Madrid Pozuelo

🇪🇸

Madrid, Spain

Hosp Regional Univ de Malaga

🇪🇸

Malaga, Spain

Clinica Gaias

🇪🇸

Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Hosp. Quiron Sagrado Corazon

🇪🇸

Sevilla, Spain

Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Valencia

🇪🇸

Valencia, Spain

Adana City Hospital

🇹🇷

Adana, Turkey

Gulhane Training and Research Hospital

🇹🇷

Ankara, Turkey

Ankara Bilkent City Hospital

🇹🇷

Ankara, Turkey

Hacettepe University Medical Faculty

🇹🇷

Ankara, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath