Long-term Outcome of End-stage Renal Disease Patients Treated With Hig-efficiency Hemodiafiltration
- Conditions
- End-stage Renal Disease
- Interventions
- Other: Hemodiafiltration
- Registration Number
- NCT02576873
- Lead Sponsor
- Chulalongkorn University
- Brief Summary
A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 66 end-stage renal disease patients who underwent high-efficiency hemodiafiltration technique in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between 2001-2013 to determine the survival rate as well as other long-term outcome.
- Detailed Description
Growing evidences suggested the superiority of high-efficiency hemodiafiltration (HDF) which could provide both diffusion and convection in a single therapy compared with the conventional hemodialysis. However, the long-term, upto 10 years, outcome still limited. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 66 end-stage renal disease patients who underwent high-efficiency hemodiafiltration technique in a single-center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, between 2001-2013 to determine the survival rate as well as other long-term outcome
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 66
- Aged 18 years or more
- Be diagnosed end-stage renal disease for more than one year
- Have been regularly received long-term hemodiafiltration for more than 6 months.
- Patients who received hemodiafiltration less than 6 months
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Hemodiafiltration Hemodiafiltration End-stage renal disease patients who were treated with high-efficiency hemodiafiltration for more than 6 months
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Survival rate 10 years The Kaplan-Meier survival curve and mean survival time will be demonstrated for primary outcome.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of survival differences between patients who start renal replacement therapy with HDF and who switched from hemodialysis as well as between diabetic and non-diabetic patient. 10 years Survival differences between groups will be evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. The comparative groups include:
* Patient who start renal replacement therapy with HDF (incident cases) vs. who switched from hemodialysis (prevalence cases)
* Diabetic vs. Non-diabetic patientsFactors that associated with all-cause mortality 10 years univariate and multivariate analysis the factors that might affected the long-term outcomes. The factors include dialytic parameters (spKt/Vurea, TAC urea), nutritional parameters (nPNA, albumin), inflammatory parameter (hsCRP), and biochemical parameters (BUN, Cr, Ca, Phosphate, iPTH, beta2-microglobulin, Hb, Ferritin, Transferrin saturation, Cholesterol, Triglyceride, HDL, and LDL)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
🇹🇭Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand