MedPath

Dexmedetomidine-ketamine in Femur Proximal Fracture Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Pain
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT02150759
Lead Sponsor
Inje University
Brief Summary

* Comparison study of analgesic effects for dexmedetomidine-fentanyl vs dexmedetomidine-ketamine

* lateral position for spinal anesthesia in femur proximal fracture patients

Detailed Description

* Dexmedetomidine (1mcg/kg)- fentanyl (1mcg/kg) vs dexmedetomidine (1mcg/kg) - ketamine (1mg/kg) 10 minutes loading.

* After 10 minutes of drug infusion, patients are prepared for spinal anesthesia.

* pain scale and quality of patient positioning are measured three times (lateral position, chest-knee position, intrathecal local anesthetics injection)

* When patients have severe pain during intraoperative period, fentanyl 50 mcg will be intravenously inject.

* Patients will be injected propofol 10mg when they have agitation signs during operation.

* vital signs, bispectral index, korean version of mini mental status examination, verbal rating scale,fentany/propofol consumption, frequency of intrathecal injection

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
46
Inclusion Criteria
  • American society of anesthesiologists classification 1-3 patients
  • >20 years old
Exclusion Criteria
  • patients refuse
  • dementia patients, cooperation difficult patients
  • anaphylaxis of dexmedetomidine, ketamine, local anesthetics
  • heart problem (bradycardia, atrioventricular block)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Dexmedetomidine-ketamineKetamineDexmedetomidine-ketamine group
Dexmedetomidine-ketamineDexmedetomidineDexmedetomidine-ketamine group
Dexmedetomidine-fentanylDexmedetomidineDexmedetomidine-fentanyl group
Dexmedetomidine-fentanylFentanylDexmedetomidine-fentanyl group
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain Score Using Five Scalesaverage 10-20 minutes

We want to compare pain score (five scales; 0=calm, 1=facial grimacing, 2=moaning, 3=screaming, 4=restlessness or agitation, unable to proceed) when patients are lateral position during spinal anesthesia.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Quality of Patient Positioningaverage 10-20 minutes during spinal anesthesia

We estimate quality of patient positioning (0=not satisfactory, 1=satisfactory, 2=good, 3=optimal) during spinal anesthesia between two groups.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Haeundae paik hospital, inje university

🇰🇷

Busan, Korea, Republic of

Haeundae paik hospital, inje university
🇰🇷Busan, Korea, Republic of
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath