Comparison of two supraglottic airway devices that are placed over pharynx (i-gel versus ambu auragain) in adult patient undergoing various surgeries under general anesthesia.
Phase 3
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and SurgicalHealth Condition 2: 1- ObstetricsHealth Condition 3: 8- Other Procedures
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/08/072520
- Lead Sponsor
- Smt SCL general hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Elective surgeries
ASA grade 1 and 2
Exclusion Criteria
Mouth opening less then 2.5 cm
Full stomach
Hiatus hernia
Gatsro esophageal reflux disease
cervical spine disease
pharyngeal pathology
laryngeal pathology
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method QUALITY OF INSERTION <br/ ><br>WORKING PERFORMANCETimepoint: 1) Easy or difficult insertion <br/ ><br>2) Number of attempts required for insertion <br/ ><br>3) Time taken for insertion <br/ ><br>4) Oropharyngeal leak pressure after 10 minutes ofinsertion <br/ ><br>5) Airway sealing quality score after 5 minutes of insertion <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method PERIOPERATIVE HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS (PULSE RATE, SYSTOLIC BP, DIASTOLIC BP, MEAN BP, SPO2, ETCO2)Timepoint: At Baseline, <br/ ><br>Before induction, <br/ ><br>Immediately after insertion, <br/ ><br>At 1 minute after insertion, <br/ ><br>At 5 min after insertion, <br/ ><br>At 10 minutes after insertion, <br/ ><br>At 15 minutes after insertion.;POST OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONSTimepoint: Blood stained device, <br/ ><br>Tongue-lip-dental trauma, <br/ ><br>Sore throat, <br/ ><br>Hoarseness of voice, <br/ ><br>Bronchospasm or laryngospasm