Treatment for Reading and Writing Deficits Following Acquired Brain Injury
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Acquired Brain Injury
- Sponsor
- Quality Living, Inc.
- Enrollment
- 2
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in score on Word Attack subtest of the Woodcock-Johnson III Test of Achievement.
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Many people with acquired brain injuries have deficits in reading decoding, reading comprehension, and written expression. Alexia is a phenomenon in which a person who previously could read has trouble doing so after having sustained a brain injury; likewise, agraphia is an acquired writing problem affecting one or more aspects of written communication. Alexia and agraphia sometimes co-occur with one another and/or with other language challenges, but they can also occur as isolated phenomena. Methods to treat alexia and agraphia often focus on single intervention techniques that address aspects of reading or writing in isolation-such as matching written and spoken letters or letter sounds, performing choral reading, tracing letters, etc. Existing research suggests that the effectiveness of these techniques is limited. However, when used in combination, such techniques may promote improved reading and written communication skills. As such, the purpose of this research is to determine the extent to which a multicomponent intervention program improves the reading and writing capabilities of people with acquired alexia and/or agraphia.
Investigators
Karen Hux
Director of Research
Quality Living, Inc.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Survivor of acquired brain injury
- •Exhibits alexia and/or agraphia
- •Past or current client of Quality Living, Inc., Omaha, Nebraska
- •Fluent speaker of English
Exclusion Criteria
- •Vision impairment prohibiting reading of 24-point text
- •Auditory comprehension problems precluding understanding of consent/assent information
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in score on Word Attack subtest of the Woodcock-Johnson III Test of Achievement.
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks
Subtest raw sores range from 0 to 32,with higher scores indicating better performance.
Change in score on Word Reading subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test 4.
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks
Subtest raw scores range from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating better performance.
Change in score on Spelling subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test 4.
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks
Subtest raw scores range from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better performance.
Change in score on Test of Silent Reading Speed and Efficiency.
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks
Raw scores range from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating better performance.
Change in score on Passage Comprehension subtest of the Woodcock-Johnson III Test of Achievement.
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks
Subtest raw scores range from 0 to 47, with higher scores indicating better performance.
Secondary Outcomes
- Decoding errors during oral reading of passages(As the first of five tasks of each session for 8 weeks (each session is 1 hour).)
- Oral spelling of words(As the second of five tasks of each session for 8 weeks (each session is 1 hour).)
- Sight word decoding accuracy(One time per week for 8 weeks)
- Oral reading rate of passages(As the first of five tasks of each session for 8 weeks (each session is 1 hour).)