MedPath

Comparison of Two Spinal Manipulation Treatments in Patients With Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Neck Pain
Interventions
Other: Spinal manipulation
Registration Number
NCT04268667
Lead Sponsor
Clínica Ciudad de Almería
Brief Summary

There is enough evidence to suggest that the spinal manipulation of the upper cervical spine and cervicothoracic spine are effective in decreasing neck pain. Therefore, the purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of an isolated application of upper cervical spine thrust joint manipulation with the application of a full combination of cervical, cervico-thoracic and thoracic spine thrust joint manipulation on neck pain, disability and cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic mechanical neck pain.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
186
Inclusion Criteria
  • Symptom persistence for more than 12 weeks.
  • Age from 18 to 55 years.
  • Localized pain in the cervical spine.
  • Symptoms are caused by cervical movement or sustained postures.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Stage acute of symptoms.
  • Any contraindication to cervical spinal manipulation (fracture, osteoporosis, joint infections or vertebrobasilar insufficiency).
  • Patients with previous neck trauma or cervical spine surgery.
  • Patients diagnosed with cervical radiculopathy.
  • Patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia.
  • Have been treated with manual therapy in the last 3 months.
  • Receiving other treatment during the course of the study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Upper cervical spine manipulation groupSpinal manipulationSpinal thrust joint manipulation on the atlantoaxial joint
Cervicothoracic spine manipulations groupSpinal manipulationDifferent spinal thrust joint manipulations on the thoracic spine (T6), mid-cervical spine (C3-C4) and cervicothoracic junction (C7-T1).
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in neck pain at rest: Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0-10)Baseline and 7 days post-treatment

Neck pain at rest. Measured with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0 = ''no pain'' and 10 = ''worst imaginable pain).

Change in neck disability: Neck Disability Index (0-50)Baseline and 7 days post-treatment

Neck disability is measured with Neck Disability Index (10 items). A higher score indicates greater disability.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in flexion movement: Cervical Range of Motion deviceBaseline and 7 days post-treatment

Range of cervical motion in flexion. Measured with a Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device

Change in extension movement: Cervical Range of Motion deviceBaseline and 7 days post-treatment

Range of cervical motion in extension. Measured with a Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device

Change in rigth lateral flexion movement: Cervical Range of Motion deviceBaseline and 7 days post-treatment

Range of cervical motion in right lateral flexion. Measured with a Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device

Change in left lateral flexion movement: Cervical Range of Motion deviceBaseline and 7 days post-treatment

Range of cervical motion in left lateral flexion. Measured with a Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device

Change in right rotation movement: Cervical Range of Motion deviceBaseline and 7 days post-treatment

Range of cervical motion in right rotation. Measured with a Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device

Change in left rotation movement: Cervical Range of Motion deviceBaseline and 7 days post-treatment

Range of cervical motion in left rotation. Measured with a Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Clínica Ciudad de Almería

🇪🇸

Almería, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath