跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05043909
NCT05043909已完成不适用

Virtual Reality Training System on Oral Health Care for Dependency Elderly in Oral Hygiene Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 23 人开始时间: 2020年10月27日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
23
试验地点
1
主要终点
Elderly oral care-related knowledge

研究概览

简要总结

Virtual reality (VR) has been proposed as a promising technology for education since the combination of immersive and interactive features enables experiential learning. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of VR-based training on oral health care for dependency elderly among oral hygiene students.

详细描述

A randomized controlled trial was conducted. Overall, the study recruited students from third grade of Department of Oral Hygiene students in Kaohsiung Medical University during 2021. The participants were randomly assigned to virtual-reality experimental (EG; n = 11) and control (CG; n = 12) groups. The students in EG received a 2-hour VR training for elderly oral health care at 2-week (Time 2), 4-week (Time 3) and 6-week (Time 4) follow-ups. Each student collected the data by a self-administrated questionnaire before and immediately after each of the intervention. Linear regression in generalized estimating equations (GEE) compare the differences between both groups.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 21 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • third grade of Department of Oral Hygiene students in Kaohsiung Medical University during the 2021 academic semester
  • Participants have to take both the courses of 'Basic Medical Nursing Care' and 'Oral Health Care for Community People and Long-term Care Residents' before intervention.

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Elderly oral care-related knowledge

时间窗: Change from Baseline knowledge at 2-, 4-, 6-week follow-ups after the interventions

Twenty items measured elderly oral care-related knowledge; for example, 'There is no need to consider the size of the interdental brush.' Possible responses included True (1), False (0), and I do not know (0), with possible scores ranged from 0 to 20; a higher score indicated a higher degree of oral-care-related knowledge. The KR-20 coefficient was 0.56 for this scale

Attitude toward elderly oral care

时间窗: Change from Baseline attitude at 2-, 4-, 6-week follow-ups after the interventions

Seven items measured attitude toward elderly oral care, for example, 'Assist disabled elderly to clean their teeth is annoying.' Each item was scored on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Possible scores ranged from 5 to 35; a higher score indicated a more positive attitude toward oral care for the elderly. Cronbach's alpha was 0.70 for this scale.

Self-efficacy of elderly oral care

时间窗: Change from Baseline self-efficacy at 2-, 4-, 6-week follow-ups after the interventions

Eleven items were used to evaluate the self-efficacy of elderly oral care. Students indicated their degrees of agreement with statements related to perceptions of personal ability concerning oral care for the elderly. For example, 'I am confident to remind disable elderly having regular dental visits every six months.' Each item was scored on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Possible scores ranged from 5 to 55; a higher score indicated more substantial confidence toward oral care for the elderly. Cronbach's alpha was 0.87 for this scale.

Intention to elderly oral care behaviors

时间窗: Change from Baseline intentions at 2-, 4-, 6-week follow-ups after the interventions

Twelve items were used to evaluate the intention to elderly oral care behavior for elderly. Students indicated their goals of adding new behaviors or modifying existing behaviors of oral care for the elderly. For example, 'I will take the initiative to assist disabled elderly to clean their dentures.' Each item was scored on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验