Comparison of hand movement between two robotic training conditions in patients with paralysis of one side of body

Phase 2

Active, not recruiting

Conditions: Health Condition 1: G819- Hemiplegia, unspecified

Registration Number: CTRI/2023/10/059335

Lead Sponsor: Saloni R. Khandelwal

Brief Summary: Not available

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: Closed to Recruitment of Participants

Sex: Not specified

Target Recruitment: 0

Inclusion Criteria

First ever unilateral ischemic/ Hemorrhagic stroke diagnosed by CT scan or MRI, Age group between 18-80 years, Patients with subacute, and chronic stroke, Having a sitting balance and being able to maintain at least 45-60 mins, Full Passive ROM for Wrist and MCP, PIP, and DIP joints, Modified Ashworth Scale score of the distal part of the upper limb less than or equal to 2 for finger flexor and finger extensor, Patients who are able to do 10º wrist extension, 10º finger extension and 10º of thumb extension or abduction, Patient having a functional vision.

Exclusion Criteria

MOCA score of < 26/30 in Kannada version,

Combined fractures with or without metal implants,

Severe neuralgia of upper limb and Hand (NPRS > 5),

Wernick’s Aphasia and Global Aphasia,

Patients with perceptual dysfunction like hemispatial neglect (Line bisection test), apraxia, and finger agnosia,

Visual impairment such as homonymous hemianopia,

Complex regional pain syndrome

Study & Design

Study Type: Interventional

Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Root mean square value of the maximum amplitude of Muscle Contraction in milivolt of the upper limbs muscles through Surface EMG. <br/ ><br>Motor Learning through the score of the assessment game. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: At Day 1 ( baseline) <br/ ><br>At Day 2 <br/ ><br>At Day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Measurement of angle in shoulder joint abduction and trunk flexion using the Kinovea software. <br/ ><br>Assessment of muscle activity Pre and Post-training through surface Emg. <br/ ><br>Participant’s interview using the Post training Satisfaction QuestionnaireTimepoint: At Day 2 <br/ ><br>At Day 3