Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02438228
NCT02438228
Completed
Not Applicable

Estimation of Cardiac Output by Nine Different Pulse Contour Algorithms Compared With Transpulmonary Thermodilution

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentNovember 2014
ConditionsCardiac Output

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cardiac Output
Sponsor
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Accuracy of cardiac output in l/min by nine different pulse contour algorithms compared with transpulmonary thermodilution
Status
Completed
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of the present study is to compare accuracy and precision of Cardiac Output (CO) by nine different pulse contour algorithms with transpulmonary thermodilution before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Detailed Description

After induction of anesthesia, a central venous catheter and a transpulmonary thermodilution catheter (Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany) are introduced in the right internal jugular vein and in the femoral artery, respectively. The thermodilution catheter is connected to a PiCCO2 monitor (Software version 1.3.0.8). Thereafter, placement of an esophageal doppler probe is performed and the probe is connected to a unique Monitoring System (Deltex Medical, Chichester, UK) with nine different pulse contour algorithms. Cardiac Output by esophageal doppler is used to calibrate the nine different pulse contour algorithms. After induction of anesthesia and establishment of all monitoring devices, a passive leg raising maneouvre (PLR) is performed and hemodynamic variables including CO by transpulmonary thermodilution (COTPTD) and CO by nine different pulse contour algorithms (COX1-9) are recorded before, during and after PLR. Subsequently, measurements of COTPTD and COX1-9 are carried out every 10 minutes until the beginning of CPB. Fifteen minutes after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass calibration of nine different pulse contour algorithms by esophageal doppler are performed again and measurements of CITPTD and CIPFX are restarted up to the end of the surgical Intervention.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 2014
End Date
November 2015
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ole Broch, MD

MD

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients \> 18 years of age with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 0.
  • Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients \<18 years of age and with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0.5 are not considered for the study.
  • Emergency procedures and patients with hemodynamic instability requiring continuous pharmacologic support, intracardiac shunts, severe aortic-, tricuspid- or mitral stenosis or insufficiency and mechanical circulatory support were also excluded.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Accuracy of cardiac output in l/min by nine different pulse contour algorithms compared with transpulmonary thermodilution

Time Frame: After induction of anesthesia until the end of surgery

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials