Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03636048
NCT03636048
Terminated
Not Applicable

Comparison of General Anesthesia and Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transabdominal Cervico Isthmic Cerclage (TCIC)

Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital1 site in 1 country20 target enrollmentAugust 1, 2018

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Bupivacaine Hcl 0.5% Inj
Conditions
Cervical Incompetence
Sponsor
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
Enrollment
20
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Pain score at 24hours after the end of the operation
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The investigator aimed to compare the effect of anesthesia on overall postoperative outcomes including post-operative pain score and the fetal well-being (heart rate) in patients undergoing transabdominal cervico isthmic cerclage(TCIC). The investigator divided the patients into two groups. The first group was the patients who undergo general anesthesia with postoperative wound patient-controlled analgesia device(PCA) and the second group was the patients who undergo combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSE) with postoperative epidural catheter PCA device for pain control.

Detailed Description

Transabdominal cervico isthmic cerclage(TCIC) is performed for the pregnants with Incompetent Internal Os of the Cervix(IIOC) to maintain pregnancy. It is the operation that incise the lower abdomen and ligate the cervix in pelvic cavity. In our center, the surgery was conventionally performed under general anesthesia. Also, for pain control, operator has been inserting a catheter into the incision site and connected the wound PCA. In this way, there were some limitations that the wound PCA could only control the somatic pain and there were significant rates of post-operative nausea and vomiting as common complication of general anesthesia. Thus, the investigator planned to conduct combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSE) with postoperative pain control with epidural catheter and compare overall postoperative outcomes with conventional general anesthesia.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 1, 2018
End Date
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Female

Investigators

Sponsor
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients who undergo TCIC for IIOC and agree to participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Hepatic failure
  • Chronic kidney disease(\>stage III)
  • Hypersensitivity, allergic response and/or resistance to drugs used in this study(ex. pethidine, ropivacaine)
  • Spinal anesthesia is not possible
  • Refuse to participate in the study
  • Cannot understand the agreement
  • Body weight is under 50 kg or over 100 kg

Arms & Interventions

Spinal anesthesia group

Spinal anesthesia is used for operation with epidural patient-controlled device for pain control. Bupivacaine Hcl 0.5% Inj. 9-10mg is injected into intrathecal space for anesthesia. 0.2% ropivacaine is used for postoperative pain control with continuous infusion into epidural space.

Intervention: Bupivacaine Hcl 0.5% Inj

General anesthesia group

General anesthesia is used for operation with wound patient-controlled device for pain control. propofol (10milligram/ML) 1.5-2 mg/ml is used as bolus intravascular injection for induction of anesthesia. 0.5% ropivacaine is used for postoperative pain control with continous infusion through wound catheter.

Intervention: Propofol 10 milligram/ML

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain score at 24hours after the end of the operation

Time Frame: Assessed by directly asking to the patient, from date of randomization up to postoperative day 3.

Numerical Rating Score(0-10), 0:no pain, 5:moderate pain, 10:worst pain

Secondary Outcomes

  • Fetal viability on postoperative day 5(Assessed by ultrasonography, upto postoperative day 5.)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials