MedPath

Comparison of Efficacy of Ivabradine Versus Metoprolol

Phase 4
Conditions
Coronary Artery Disease
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01755663
Lead Sponsor
Col. Suthee Panichkul
Brief Summary

Ivabradine may be better than Metoprolol for controlling heart rate before Coronary CTA.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • elective patient on scheduled for 640 slices CT coronary at Phramonkutklao hospital
  • Resting heart rate > 70 BPM
  • age > 18 years and informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Heart rate > 100 BPM
  • BP <100/60 mmHg
  • recent congestive heart failure in 1 mo.
  • SA node, AV node disease and AF
  • on permanent pacemaker
  • CrCL < 15ml/min. , AST or ALT > 3x UNL
  • on HR reducing drug such as diltiazem, verapamil, digitalis
  • contraindication for ivabradine or metoprolol

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
metoprololIvabradine and MetoprololMetoprolol (100) 1/2 tab bid pc for 3 day and the day of CT coronary , and placebo of ivabradine
IvabradineIvabradine and MetoprololPatients will recieved ivabradine(5) 1 tab bid pc for 3 day and the day of CT, and recieve placebo of metoprolol
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Heart rate of patient before CT coronary1 January 2013 to 31 december 2013
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
safety and side effect of Metoprolol and Ivabradine1 january 2013 to 31 december 2013

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Phramonkutklao Hospital

🇹🇭

Bangkok, Thailand

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath