MedPath

A Phase III Study Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BAT1406 and Humira

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04135508
Lead Sponsor
Bio-Thera Solutions
Brief Summary

A Phase III Study Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BAT1406 and Humira

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active comparator, parallel two arm study to compare the efficacy, and to evaluate the safety, and immunogenicity of BAT1406 to Humira® in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) to demonstrate clinical equivalence of BAT1406 and Humira®.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
554
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria
  1. Subjects have used any biological products to treat AS within 6 months prior to the enrollment.

  2. Clinical or imaging studies suggested that the spine has reached complete rigidity (if there were two consecutive lumbar vertebrae not fused together, then the spine has not reached complete rigidity).

  3. Allergic to any ingredients of Humira, allergic to human proteins or susceptible to immunoglobulin allergies.

  4. Subjects with a medical history of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV, any immunodeficiency, or with a positive laboratory test result (hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody, or HIV antibody) during screening.

  5. Subjects diagnosed with active pulmonary tuberculosis, latent tuberculosis infection, or subjects suspected of tuberculosis based on clinical manifestations (including but not limited to pulmonary tuberculosis).

  6. Subjects with positive T.SPOT.TB test or abnormalities in tuberculosis-related chest X-ray; or subjects with TB who have not received standard treatment of at least 30 days.

  7. Active infections, including acute and chronic infections, and local infections (such as sepsis, abscesses, opportunistic infections, and invasive fungal infections).

  8. Subjects who have taken oral antibiotics within 2 weeks prior to the screening or have been given intramuscular/intravenous treatments for infection within 4 weeks prior to the screening, or have had severe infections within 6 months prior to the screening (investigators must determine the potential risks of subjects' enrollment based on the individual's clinical history).

  9. Subjects with a history of recurrent herpes zoster, history of Listeria infection, reticuloendotheliosis, and other chronic or recurrent infections.

  10. Subjects who have undergone ostectomy/arthrectomy/synovectomy within 3 months prior to the screening, or planned to undergo joint or spinal surgery during the trial.

  11. Subjects with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities that suggested the presence of unknown disease and required further clinical examination.

  12. Subjects with an apparent history of drug abuse or alcohol dependence at present or in the past 2 years.

  13. Subjects with one or more of the following diseases:

    1. Subjects without self-care ability, those who require wheelchairs or those who are bedridden;
    2. Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic pressure >150 mmHg, or diastolic pressure >100 mmHg during the screening period);
    3. Subjects with a history of congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association classification III/IV);
    4. Subjects with a history of acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 12 months prior to the screening;
    5. Subjects with serious arrhythmias;
    6. Any subject with clinically significant respiratory diseases, including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, interstitial lung disease, bronchiectasis, and pleural effusion;
    7. Subjects with a history of demyelinating diseases or with symptoms suggestive of such diseases, including but not limited to: multiple sclerosis and Guillain-Barré syndrome;
    8. Subjects who had not used a stable dose of medication to control diabetes within 4 weeks prior to the screening (glycated hemoglobin HbA1c >7% during screening);

    h.Subjects with any arthritis or rheumatic diseases (in addition to AS) that may affect the evaluation of the clinical study, including but not limited to: rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, gouty arthritis, and fibromyalgia; j.Subjects with any neurological, psychotic, or other systemic diseases that may affect the clinical efficacy evaluation; k.Subjects who have had a history of malignancy in the past 5 years (except for non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ that have been cured); l.History of lymphoma or lymphoproliferative diseases.

  14. Subjects using the following concomitant drugs:

    1. Have used alkylating preparations within 12 months prior to the screening.
    2. Injected corticosteroids into the joint cavity, muscle or vein within 4 weeks prior to screening.
  15. Subjects who have participated in other clinical trials within 3 months prior to the enrollment or planned to participate in other clinical trials.

  16. The investigator determined that the subject was not suitable for this trial.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
BAT1406BAT1406Adalimumab, 40 mg/0.8 mL/vial, subcutaneously 1 vial every two weeks, up to a maximum of 6 months treatment.
HumiraHumiraAdalimumab, 40 mg/0.8 mL/vial, subcutaneously 1 vial every two weeks, up to a maximum of 6 months treatment.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 20week 12

the percentage of subjects achieving the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 20 treatment response

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of subjects achieving ASAS20 treatment responseweek 24

the percentage of subjects achieving the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 20 treatment response

Percentage of subjects achieving ASAS40 treatment responseweek 12; week 24

the percentage of subjects achieving the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 40 treatment response

Percentage of subjects achieving ASAS5/6 treatment responseweek 12; week 24

the percentage of subjects achieving ASAS5/6 treatment response

Percentage of subjects achieving BASDAI50 treatment responseweek 12; week 24

the percentage of subjects achieving BASDAI50 treatment response

Change of the performance status score compared with baselineweek 12; week 24

The performance status is used for measuring and evaluating disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Change of the spinal pain score compared with baselineweek 12; week 24

the spinal pain is used for measuring and evaluating disease pain in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Change of morning stiffness duration compared with baselineweek 12; week 24

The morning stiffness duration is used for measuring and evaluating disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Change of ASDAS compared with baselineweek 12; week 24

The ASDAS is used for measuring and evaluating disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Change of BASDAI compared with baselineweek 12; week 24

The BASDAI is used for measuring and evaluating disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Change of BASFI compared with baselineweek 12; week 24

The BASFI consist of a set of 10 questions designed to determine the degree of functional limitation in subjects with AS. The BASFI score was derived based on the average of questions 1 through 10. The first 8 questions considered activities related to functional anatomy and the final 2 questions assessed the subject's ability to cope with everyday life over the last week. A 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) was used to answer the questions and the mean of the ten scales gave the BASFI score a value between 0 (easy) and 10 (impossible).

Change of BASMI compared with baselineweek 12; week 24

The BASMI measures the range of motion based on five clinical measurements: 1) cervical rotation, 2) tragus to wall distance, 3) lumbar side flexion, 4) lumbar flexion (modified Schober's) and 5) intermalleolar distance. The total BASMI score ranges from 0 to 10 reflecting mild to moderate disease activity and functional ability in the spinal column. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the patient's limitation of movement due to their ankylosing spondylitis

Change of SF-36 compared with baselineweek 12; week 24

SF-36 survey will be used to calculate overall, mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) component scores at week 12; week 24 compared to baseline

Change of EQ-5D compared with baselineweek 12; week 24

EQ-5D is a standard instrument to measure of health status

Change of chest expansion compared with baselineweek 12; week 24

Chest expansion, measured in cm, is defined as the difference in thoracic circumference during full expiration versus full inspiration, measured at the fourth intercostal space (nipple line). The better of 2 tries was recorded. Higher scores indicate better health. Change from baseline greater than (\>) 0 represented improvement.

Change of MASES compared with baselineweek 12; week 24

The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right.

Change of swollen and tender joint counts at week 12 and week 24 compared with baseline.week 12; week 24
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath