A Phase III Study Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BAT1406 and Humira
- Registration Number
- NCT04135508
- Lead Sponsor
- Bio-Thera Solutions
- Brief Summary
A Phase III Study Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BAT1406 and Humira
- Detailed Description
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active comparator, parallel two arm study to compare the efficacy, and to evaluate the safety, and immunogenicity of BAT1406 to Humira® in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) to demonstrate clinical equivalence of BAT1406 and Humira®.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 554
Not provided
-
Subjects have used any biological products to treat AS within 6 months prior to the enrollment.
-
Clinical or imaging studies suggested that the spine has reached complete rigidity (if there were two consecutive lumbar vertebrae not fused together, then the spine has not reached complete rigidity).
-
Allergic to any ingredients of Humira, allergic to human proteins or susceptible to immunoglobulin allergies.
-
Subjects with a medical history of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV, any immunodeficiency, or with a positive laboratory test result (hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody, or HIV antibody) during screening.
-
Subjects diagnosed with active pulmonary tuberculosis, latent tuberculosis infection, or subjects suspected of tuberculosis based on clinical manifestations (including but not limited to pulmonary tuberculosis).
-
Subjects with positive T.SPOT.TB test or abnormalities in tuberculosis-related chest X-ray; or subjects with TB who have not received standard treatment of at least 30 days.
-
Active infections, including acute and chronic infections, and local infections (such as sepsis, abscesses, opportunistic infections, and invasive fungal infections).
-
Subjects who have taken oral antibiotics within 2 weeks prior to the screening or have been given intramuscular/intravenous treatments for infection within 4 weeks prior to the screening, or have had severe infections within 6 months prior to the screening (investigators must determine the potential risks of subjects' enrollment based on the individual's clinical history).
-
Subjects with a history of recurrent herpes zoster, history of Listeria infection, reticuloendotheliosis, and other chronic or recurrent infections.
-
Subjects who have undergone ostectomy/arthrectomy/synovectomy within 3 months prior to the screening, or planned to undergo joint or spinal surgery during the trial.
-
Subjects with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities that suggested the presence of unknown disease and required further clinical examination.
-
Subjects with an apparent history of drug abuse or alcohol dependence at present or in the past 2 years.
-
Subjects with one or more of the following diseases:
- Subjects without self-care ability, those who require wheelchairs or those who are bedridden;
- Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic pressure >150 mmHg, or diastolic pressure >100 mmHg during the screening period);
- Subjects with a history of congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association classification III/IV);
- Subjects with a history of acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 12 months prior to the screening;
- Subjects with serious arrhythmias;
- Any subject with clinically significant respiratory diseases, including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, interstitial lung disease, bronchiectasis, and pleural effusion;
- Subjects with a history of demyelinating diseases or with symptoms suggestive of such diseases, including but not limited to: multiple sclerosis and Guillain-Barré syndrome;
- Subjects who had not used a stable dose of medication to control diabetes within 4 weeks prior to the screening (glycated hemoglobin HbA1c >7% during screening);
h.Subjects with any arthritis or rheumatic diseases (in addition to AS) that may affect the evaluation of the clinical study, including but not limited to: rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, gouty arthritis, and fibromyalgia; j.Subjects with any neurological, psychotic, or other systemic diseases that may affect the clinical efficacy evaluation; k.Subjects who have had a history of malignancy in the past 5 years (except for non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ that have been cured); l.History of lymphoma or lymphoproliferative diseases.
-
Subjects using the following concomitant drugs:
- Have used alkylating preparations within 12 months prior to the screening.
- Injected corticosteroids into the joint cavity, muscle or vein within 4 weeks prior to screening.
-
Subjects who have participated in other clinical trials within 3 months prior to the enrollment or planned to participate in other clinical trials.
-
The investigator determined that the subject was not suitable for this trial.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description BAT1406 BAT1406 Adalimumab, 40 mg/0.8 mL/vial, subcutaneously 1 vial every two weeks, up to a maximum of 6 months treatment. Humira Humira Adalimumab, 40 mg/0.8 mL/vial, subcutaneously 1 vial every two weeks, up to a maximum of 6 months treatment.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 20 week 12 the percentage of subjects achieving the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 20 treatment response
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of subjects achieving ASAS20 treatment response week 24 the percentage of subjects achieving the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 20 treatment response
Percentage of subjects achieving ASAS40 treatment response week 12; week 24 the percentage of subjects achieving the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 40 treatment response
Percentage of subjects achieving ASAS5/6 treatment response week 12; week 24 the percentage of subjects achieving ASAS5/6 treatment response
Percentage of subjects achieving BASDAI50 treatment response week 12; week 24 the percentage of subjects achieving BASDAI50 treatment response
Change of the performance status score compared with baseline week 12; week 24 The performance status is used for measuring and evaluating disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Change of the spinal pain score compared with baseline week 12; week 24 the spinal pain is used for measuring and evaluating disease pain in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Change of morning stiffness duration compared with baseline week 12; week 24 The morning stiffness duration is used for measuring and evaluating disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Change of ASDAS compared with baseline week 12; week 24 The ASDAS is used for measuring and evaluating disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Change of BASDAI compared with baseline week 12; week 24 The BASDAI is used for measuring and evaluating disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Change of BASFI compared with baseline week 12; week 24 The BASFI consist of a set of 10 questions designed to determine the degree of functional limitation in subjects with AS. The BASFI score was derived based on the average of questions 1 through 10. The first 8 questions considered activities related to functional anatomy and the final 2 questions assessed the subject's ability to cope with everyday life over the last week. A 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) was used to answer the questions and the mean of the ten scales gave the BASFI score a value between 0 (easy) and 10 (impossible).
Change of BASMI compared with baseline week 12; week 24 The BASMI measures the range of motion based on five clinical measurements: 1) cervical rotation, 2) tragus to wall distance, 3) lumbar side flexion, 4) lumbar flexion (modified Schober's) and 5) intermalleolar distance. The total BASMI score ranges from 0 to 10 reflecting mild to moderate disease activity and functional ability in the spinal column. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the patient's limitation of movement due to their ankylosing spondylitis
Change of SF-36 compared with baseline week 12; week 24 SF-36 survey will be used to calculate overall, mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) component scores at week 12; week 24 compared to baseline
Change of EQ-5D compared with baseline week 12; week 24 EQ-5D is a standard instrument to measure of health status
Change of chest expansion compared with baseline week 12; week 24 Chest expansion, measured in cm, is defined as the difference in thoracic circumference during full expiration versus full inspiration, measured at the fourth intercostal space (nipple line). The better of 2 tries was recorded. Higher scores indicate better health. Change from baseline greater than (\>) 0 represented improvement.
Change of MASES compared with baseline week 12; week 24 The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right.
Change of swollen and tender joint counts at week 12 and week 24 compared with baseline. week 12; week 24