A study to compare ease of learning intubation(securing airway) using classic laryngoscope(MacIntosh) or video assisted laryngoscpe by beginners after training.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/03/040734
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care PT BD Sharma PGIMS Rohtak
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Belonging to ASA I and II
Modified Mallampati grade 1 or 2
Thromental distance >6cm
Interincisor distance >3.5cm
Scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesis and tracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
Belonging to ASA III and IV
Modified Mallampati grade 3 or 4
Thromental distance <6cm
Interincisor distance <3.5cm
Restricted neck movement
With receding mandible
With facial abnormalities
Who are at risk of regurgitation and aspiration for example intestinal obstruction, hernia, intestinal perforation etc
With chest wall deformity
Who are pregnant
With known advanced cardiovascular disease
Patients with obstructive sleep apnea
Who refuse to participate
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method to compare intuabtion time and Intubation Difficulty Scale(IDS) score using direct and videoassisted macintosh laryngoscopeTimepoint: The parameters are recorded at 0 min to every min until intubation is done(inflation of ETT cuff) <br/ ><br>IDS is recorded at the end of procedure.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the rate of successful placement of ETT and CL GRADE of glottic view using direct and video assisted MacIntosh laryngoscopeTimepoint: The pareameters will be recorded at 0min to fall in saturation to less than 92% <br/ ><br>CL grade recorded at the end of procedure