MedPath

Effect of enterally administered sleep-promoting medication on the intravenous sedative dose and its safety and cost profile in mechanically ventilated patients: a retrospective cohort study

Not Applicable
Conditions
critical ill patients
Registration Number
JPRN-UMIN000043475
Lead Sponsor
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center
Brief Summary

The average daily propofol dose per body weight administered as a continuous sedative during mechanical ventilation through an oral endotracheal tube was significantly lower in the early administration group (EA group) than in the late administration (LA group) and no administration group (NA group) (Beta Coefficient -5.18 [95% CI -8.95 to -1.40], Beta Coefficient -4.51 [95% CI -8.58 to -0.44]); however, there was no difference between the LA and NA groups (Beta Coefficient 0.66 [95% CI -3.14 to 4.46]).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Complete: follow-up complete
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
123
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

central nervous system disease (stroke, epilepsy, meningitis, encephalitis, etc.), cardiopulmonary arrest, traumatic brain injury, overdose, gastrointestinal tract impracticability (administration of continuous neuromuscular blockade, abdominal surgery, ileus, gastrointestinal bleeding, etc.), previous psychiatric or cognitive pathology, Child C hepatopathy, pregnancy, previous tracheostomy, ICU readmission, lacking body weight records, death in ICU, and not receiving propofol.

Study & Design

Study Type
Observational
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The average daily propofol dose per body weight administered as a continuous sedative during mechanical ventilation through an oral endotracheal tube.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath