Does preemptive hydromorphone and ropivacaine thoracic epidural analgesia have clinical benefits?
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- This study compares clinical perioperative analgesia and hemodynamic stability and outcome between preemptively applied thoracic epidural patient controlled analgesia and that applied at the end of surgery in patients undergoing lung surgery under open thoracotomy.Anaesthesiology - Anaesthetics
- Registration Number
- ACTRN12613000813785
- Lead Sponsor
- Samsung Seoul Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
1. aged between 20-75 years
2. American Society of Physical Status (ASA PS) I-II
3. scheduled for open thoracotomy with a thoracic epidural catheter inserted on the previous day of the surgery
Exclusion Criteria
patients with renal, hepatic, or cardiac dysfunction, neurologic disorder, previous opioids, corticosteroids, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within one week of surgery, previous anticoagulation therapy, allergy to local anesthetics or opioids, or inability to use patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) or perform portable pulmonary function test.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in numerial rating scale of postoperative pain at postoperative 48 hour between the two groups.[postoperative 48 hour]
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method