Efficacy and Safety of Etomidate Sedation in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
- Conditions
- Sedation ComplicationEndoscopic Submucosal DissectionEsophagogastroduodenoscopy
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT05407870
- Lead Sponsor
- Korea University Anam Hospital
- Brief Summary
During endoscopy, the patient is sedated to relieve pain and improve the ease of the procedure. Sedation endoscopy using propofol is effective, but has the disadvantage that cardiopulmonary side effects are frequently observed. However, etomidate is known to have hemodynamic and respiratory stability.The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of etomidate and propofol in sedated gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 138
- Age 19-80
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA) score of I, II, III
- Scheduled endoscopy
- Pregnancy
- Previous study History of hypersensitivity to drugs or substances containing soy or egg ingredients
- Those who think that tracheal intubation will be difficult
- Obstructive sleep apnea
- History of side effects from previous sedatives
- People with severe liver disease, kidney disease, or heart disease
- Those who want a non-sleeping endoscope
- A person who refuses to provide consent
- SBP < 80mmHg or SpO2 < 90%
- Patients with adrenocortical dysfunction, chronic steroid users
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Propofol Propofol Injection induction - 0.5mg/kg Propofol maintenance - 0.25mg/kg Propofol Etomidate Etomidate Injection induction - 0.25mg/kg Propofol + 0.05mg/kg Etomidate maintenance - 0.05mg/kg Etomidate
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Respiratory adverse event during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection the number and proportion of cases of respiratory depression
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ESD clinical outcomes From enrollment to the first clinic visit (within 60 days) tumor location, tumor pathology, ESD specimen size, En-bloc resection, submucosal invasion, margin positive
Adverse events and procedure interruptions during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection Overall adverse events Cardiopulmonary adverse events Procedure-related adverse events
Overall procedure interruption procedure interruption due to cardiopulmonary adverse events procedure interruption due to procedure-related adverse eventsSedation-related profile From initial administering the sedative drug to endoscopy room discharge (up to 2 hours); dose (ml) administered dose of sedatives (induction dose, maintenance dose, total dose), induction time, awake time, sedation time
Satisfaction assessment From initial administering the sedative drug to endoscopy room discharge; satisfaction score (0-10, 10 is the highest score) patient satisfaction regarding sedation, doctor and nurse satisfaction regarding sedation during ESD
Hemodynamic changes From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (up to 2 hours) systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation
Factors associated with adverse events From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (up to three days) factor analysis regarding overall adverse events factor analysis regarding overall cardiopulmonary adverse events factor analysis regarding overall procedure adverse events
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Korea University Anam Hospital
🇰🇷Seoul, Seoung-buk Gu, Korea, Republic of