MedPath

Efficacy and Safety of Etomidate Sedation in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Sedation Complication
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT05407870
Lead Sponsor
Korea University Anam Hospital
Brief Summary

During endoscopy, the patient is sedated to relieve pain and improve the ease of the procedure. Sedation endoscopy using propofol is effective, but has the disadvantage that cardiopulmonary side effects are frequently observed. However, etomidate is known to have hemodynamic and respiratory stability.The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of etomidate and propofol in sedated gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
138
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 19-80
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA) score of I, II, III
  • Scheduled endoscopy
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnancy
  • Previous study History of hypersensitivity to drugs or substances containing soy or egg ingredients
  • Those who think that tracheal intubation will be difficult
  • Obstructive sleep apnea
  • History of side effects from previous sedatives
  • People with severe liver disease, kidney disease, or heart disease
  • Those who want a non-sleeping endoscope
  • A person who refuses to provide consent
  • SBP < 80mmHg or SpO2 < 90%
  • Patients with adrenocortical dysfunction, chronic steroid users

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PropofolPropofol Injectioninduction - 0.5mg/kg Propofol maintenance - 0.25mg/kg Propofol
EtomidateEtomidate Injectioninduction - 0.25mg/kg Propofol + 0.05mg/kg Etomidate maintenance - 0.05mg/kg Etomidate
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Respiratory adverse eventduring gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

the number and proportion of cases of respiratory depression

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
ESD clinical outcomesFrom enrollment to the first clinic visit (within 60 days)

tumor location, tumor pathology, ESD specimen size, En-bloc resection, submucosal invasion, margin positive

Adverse events and procedure interruptionsduring gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

Overall adverse events Cardiopulmonary adverse events Procedure-related adverse events

Overall procedure interruption procedure interruption due to cardiopulmonary adverse events procedure interruption due to procedure-related adverse events

Sedation-related profileFrom initial administering the sedative drug to endoscopy room discharge (up to 2 hours); dose (ml)

administered dose of sedatives (induction dose, maintenance dose, total dose), induction time, awake time, sedation time

Satisfaction assessmentFrom initial administering the sedative drug to endoscopy room discharge; satisfaction score (0-10, 10 is the highest score)

patient satisfaction regarding sedation, doctor and nurse satisfaction regarding sedation during ESD

Hemodynamic changesFrom date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (up to 2 hours)

systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation

Factors associated with adverse eventsFrom date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (up to three days)

factor analysis regarding overall adverse events factor analysis regarding overall cardiopulmonary adverse events factor analysis regarding overall procedure adverse events

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Korea University Anam Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Seoung-buk Gu, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath