MedPath

Respiratory Muscle Training in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Spinal Cord Injuries
Interventions
Device: Respiratory muscle training
Device: Control group
Registration Number
NCT05904600
Lead Sponsor
University of Castilla-La Mancha
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of a programme based on inspiratory and expiratory muscle training to improve respiratory muscle strength, functional capacity and avoid pulmonary complications in adults with cervical or high dorsal spinal cord injury (C5-D5) in acute phase.

Detailed Description

The design of the study is a randomised, triple-blind clinical trial with a control group.

The size of the sample will be 56 participants with cervical spinal cord injury and 56 with dorsal spinal cord injury. They will be randomized in two groups: experimental or control. The experimental group will perform combined inspiratory and expiratory muscle training as part of their rehabilitation programme during 6 weeks. The control group will continue their usual treatment.

Measurements will be taken at baseline, and post-intervention.

The statistical analysis will be an intention-to-treat analysis, and the data processing and analysis will be carried out with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 for Windows (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
112
Inclusion Criteria
  • People diagnosed with spinal cord injury.
  • Over 18 years of age.
  • Time of evolution less than 6 months and at least 4 weeks after the date of injury.
  • Level of lesion between C5 and D5 and degree of involvement A or B. In case of involvement A with partial preservation zone this should not include abdominal musculature according to the international standardised classification of the American Spinal Injury Association.
Exclusion Criteria
  • People with chest trauma.
  • Mechanically ventilated.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Any medical or psychiatric condition that could affect the ability to complete the study.
  • Carrying a tracheostomy tube that does not tolerate occlusion.
  • People who can not sit upright.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Respiratory muscle trainingRespiratory muscle trainingRespiratory muscle training with the Orygen-Dual Valve (Forumed S.L. ESP) and an initial load of 30% of their maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures.
Control groupControl groupSimulated training with the Orygen-Dual Valve (Forumed S.L. ESP), without load.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in maximal expiratory pressureChange after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline

The measurement of maximum static respiratory pressures will consist of performing maximum forced inspiration and expiration manoeuvres against an occluded airway in order to measure the pressure generated in the mouth, using a manometer or a pressure transducer, since, with the glottis open, the pressure in the mouth must be equal to the alveolar pressure.

Change in maximal inspiratory pressureChange after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline

The measurement of maximum static respiratory pressures will consist of performing maximum forced inspiration and expiration manoeuvres against an occluded airway in order to measure the pressure generated in the mouth, using a manometer or a pressure transducer, since, with the glottis open, the pressure in the mouth must be equal to the alveolar pressure.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in shoulder flexion strengthChange after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline

In all subjects, the maximum load they can move in one repetition (1RM) in both limbs will be assessed for shoulder flexion with Microfet4 dynamometer; Hoggan Health Industries, West Jordan, Utah.

Change in coughing capacityChange after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline

Measurement of cough capacity will be performed by determining peak cough flow using a peak expiratory flow meter (Mini Wright flow meter; Clement Clarke International Ltd., Essex, UK).

Change in number of people with respiratory complicationsChange after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline

Respiratory complications will be assessed by consulting the medical history.

Change in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1)Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline

Using a spirometer, with the mouthpiece tightly sealed around the lips, the participant is asked, from the residual volume, to perform a rapid but unforced maximal inspiratory manoeuvre. With an apnoea of less than one second at total lung capacity, the participant is asked to exhale maximally, rapidly and forcibly, until the lungs are completely empty. At this point, the participant is strongly encouraged to start the manoeuvre abruptly and to prolong the exhalation long enough to reach RV.

Change in elbow flexion strengthChange after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline

In all subjects, the maximum load they can move in one repetition (1RM) in both limbs will be assessed for elbow flexion with Microfet4 dynamometer; Hoggan Health Industries, West Jordan, Utah.

Change in forced vital capacity (FVC)Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline

Using a spirometer, with the mouthpiece tightly sealed around the lips, the participant is asked, from the residual volume, to perform a rapid but unforced maximal inspiratory manoeuvre. With an apnoea of less than one second at total lung capacity, the participant is asked to exhale maximally, rapidly and forcibly, until the lungs are completely empty. At this point, the participant is strongly encouraged to start the manoeuvre abruptly and to prolong the exhalation long enough to reach RV.

Change in health-related quality of life assessed by Short-Form 36 questionnaire.Change after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline

Health-related quality of life will be measured with the Short-Form 36 questionnaire, with values ranging from 0 to 100 (higher scores mean better health-related quality of life).

Change in cardiorespiratory fitnessChange after 6 weeks of intervention compared to baseline

Cardiorespiratory fitness will be measured using the 6-minute wheelchair propulsion test (adapted from Bass A et al. 2020). This is a validated test to measure cardiorespiratory fitness through a submaximal exercise test where the patient performs a 25-metre figure-eight run for 6 minutes and the distance covered in that time is recorded.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Sara Reina Gutiérrez

🇪🇸

Toledo, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath