Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in PEEK Oblique Cages With and Without Titanium Coating
- Conditions
- Vertebral Fusion
- Interventions
- Device: PEEKDevice: TiPEEK
- Registration Number
- NCT03063008
- Lead Sponsor
- Mohammad ARAB MOTLAGH
- Brief Summary
Clinical outcome with regard to oswestry disability index and lumbar fusion rate after implantation of titanium coated PEEK cage and common PEEK cage
- Detailed Description
Cages made of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium materials reliably produce successful fusion rates and good clinical outcomes. However, there is a paucity of studies that have assessed the optimal material of cage systems. The primary objective of this study was to compare the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) after instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using either titanium-coated polyetheretherketone (TiPEEK) or common PEEK cages. Secondary objectives were to assess differences in fusion rates and differences in pain and in quality of life between these groups.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Persistence of
- low back pain,
- sciatica and
- spinal claudication after conservative treatment attributed to L3 to L5 lumbar segments.
- previous lumbar spinal surgery
- body mass index >35 kg/m²
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Lumbar fusion with PEEK cage PEEK Control arm Lumbar fusion with TiPEEK cage TiPEEK Study arm
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical outcome assessed by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) after instrumented transforaminal lumbar fusion with TiPEEK or common PEEK 12 months Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) after instrumented transforaminal lumbar fusion with TiPEEK or common PEEK
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Fusion result 12 months Fusion rate after instrumented transforaminal lumbar fusion with TiPEEK or common PEEK