Dry Needling in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Neck Pain

Interventions: Device: Sham Dry needling
Device: Dry needling
Other: Manual therapy

Registration Number: NCT02435966

Lead Sponsor: European University of Madrid

Brief Summary: The investigators study the efficacy of a combination of dry needling plus manual therapy against sham dry needling plus manual therapy in the treatment of chronic neck pain. The investigators identify the most active trigger point in the upper trapezius and levator scapulae and administer two treatments, with an interval of 7 days, with a follow up 30 days after the first intervention. The primary outcome is the Visual Analogue Scale of Pain. Secondary outcomes ar pressure pain threshold, Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire and range of motion.

Detailed Description: A prospective single-blind randomized controlled trial, designed to assess the efficacy of dry needling in the treatment of chronic neck pain. The treatment regimes simulate the standard physiotherapy administered in real clinical settings. Patients in the intervention group receive a combination of manual therapy and dry needling (40mmx0,32 guided needles). There are two control groups. In the first one, patients receive a combination of manual therapy and sham dry needling. In the second control group, patients receive no treatment in order to assess the natural history of the disease.

Patients receive two treatment sessions with an interval of 7 days and are followed up after 30 days. The primary outcome is subjective pain assessed with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes are pressure pain threshold (assessed with a manual algometer), neck range of motion (assessed with a goniometer) and the Neck Disability Index (a standardized questionnaire). Measurements are taken pre and post-test after the first and the second treatment sessions, plus once more at the follow-up, except for the Neck Disability Index (only at the beginning and after the second treatment). In the non-treated group, patients were measured at the same time intervals.

The sample size was calculated to detect a VAS difference of 2 points, the minimally clinically important difference established in the literature. Then it was doubled in order to avoid possible dropouts. The trial takes place in a private practice in Madrid (Physios, c/Valverde 26). Patients are randomized by a computer program.

Patients are explored for active trigger points in the upper trapezius and the levator scapulae. They should meet the criteria of identification established by Travell \& Simons in their Trigger point manual. The investigators also seek for trigger points following Travell \& Simons' pain maps for these two muscles, where they identify five trigger point areas. The investigators select the most active, taking pressure pain threshold measurements of all the active trigger point, normalizing the values according to normal thresholds for each of the five areas in the two muscles. The normal thresholds were assessed in a pilot study with healthy patients. The investigators administer either dry or sham dry needling to the most active (the one with the lowest pain threshold) throughout the trial.

Dry needling is applied following Hong's technique with 40mmx0,32 guided needles, by a physiotherapist with 4 years of experience in the technique.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 131

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Manual therapy + Dry needling	Manual therapy	Manual therapy + Dry needling: 2 sessions, after a 7 days interval
Manual therapy + Sham Dry needling	Sham Dry needling	Manual therapy + Sham Dry needling: after a 7 days interval
Manual therapy + Sham Dry needling	Manual therapy	Manual therapy + Sham Dry needling: after a 7 days interval
Manual therapy + Dry needling	Dry needling	Manual therapy + Dry needling: 2 sessions, after a 7 days interval

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS: 0-10) After 30 Days	Pre-intervention (Day 1); After 1st intervention (Day 1); after 2nd intervention (7 days later); after followup (30 days later)	The Visual Analogue Scale is a validated, self-reported instrument to assess pain, with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain). We assess the change in chronic neck pain after 30 days, after to interventions in days 1 and 7) as compared to the baseline VAS

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in the Cervical Range of Motion Measured by Goniometer	Pre-intervention (Day 1); After 1st intervention (Day 1); after 2nd intervention (7 days later); after followup (30 days later)	Measured by goniometer, with the standard measurement procedure
Change in the Neck Disability Index Questionnaire	Pre-intervention (Day 1); after 2nd intervention (7 days)
Change in the Pressure Pain Threshold Measured by Algometer	Pre-intervention (Day 1); After 1st intervention (Day 1); after 2nd intervention (7 days later); after followup (30 days later)	Measured by algometer, with the standard measurement procedure