Comparative study for ocular movement recording
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Pituitary tumorpituitary tumor, skull base tumor
- Registration Number
- JPRN-jRCTs052180145
- Lead Sponsor
- ishimura Fumihiko
- Brief Summary
Three modalities, free-run electrooculographic monitoring (EOG), piezoelectric sensor monitoring (PES) and trigger electromyographic monitoring (t-EMG) were assessed and compared to detect ocular movement during endoscopic endonasal surgery for pituitary tumors. As a result, there were significant differences among three modalities to detect oculomotor and abducent nerve. Both EOG and PES were higher detection power than t-EMG for oculomotor nerve and abducent nerve. These three modalities had safe methods.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
1. Pituitary tumor undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery
2. 20 years of age or more
Exclusion Criteria
1. The patients with irreversible ocular movement disorder
2. Epilepsy
3. Severe psychiatric disorder
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method